Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
(1 edit)

Was a coincidence, I was currently writing about our new Knave 2e one shot for the Knave 2e Jam. 7 monster for 2 players is a lot! Did they use a bludgeoning weapon? Because thats a general problem with the resistance/vulnerability design of DnD. It is very hard to balance the stat block in a way so the monster has enough Hit points to be fun fight when the players exploit the vulnerability and also not a overkill if they don't. The monster needs to be defeat able for players who attack it with resistant damage types, too. It needs to be a very hard fight but it needs to be possible. So thats the dilemma in that situation, i hope thats understandable :)  

Now I am also intrigued, how did they do against the final boss? Did they directly focus the chest ? Also did the "action fight oriented" boss work well ? 

They used force damage and a flaming sword (warlocks).


They played pretty well and rolled hot.

The Final Boss I found a little hard to balance because it seemed like it should've done better damage but the regeneration mechanic kinda fizzled because the were big on light. 

(+1)

Thx for the feedback, it is very helpful! That fight is pretty hard to balance because of the weakness and strength of the monster (Same problem like before i guess). We had a playtest group wo nuked the chest and killed him pretty fast and one were they fought him in complete darkness, all their attacks had disadvantage and one of them even died. 

Personally I like the strength/weakness of the monsters but maybe it is better to get away from this type of design. Not sure, it is hard to balance but players love it when they find the weakness. 

But thx for the Feedback, i will keep it in mind <3 really appreciate it