itch.io

While your passion on these issues is clear, it’s important to address both your claims and the way they’re being presented. Let’s break this down:

1. The Issue of Repeated Posting (Spamming):
Repeatedly posting nearly identical comments—78 similar posts at an average frequency of ~0.887 comments per minute—is widely recognized as spamming. Spamming means flooding a discussion with duplicate or near-duplicate messages, which not only clutters the conversation but also disrupts constructive debate. This behavior is generally against community guidelines because it overwhelms the thread, making it harder for others to follow the discussion and evaluate any evidence you might be presenting.

2. The Need for Clear, Verified Evidence:
Serious allegations, such as claiming someone has “20 years of illegal crimes” or that a game is 100% stolen work, demand solid and verifiable evidence. Relying on repeated links—even if you assert there are multiple pieces of evidence, including lengthy audio recordings and video clips—is not sufficient if those sources aren’t independently verifiable or if the links provided don’t function as intended. If you truly have documented proof, it should be compiled and presented in a coherent, transparent manner, with clear context (dates, sources, and full transcripts where necessary) rather than through a series of rapid-fire posts.

3. Impact on the Debate:
When the same claims are repeated without additional context or new evidence in each post, it weakens the overall argument. Instead of fostering a nuanced discussion, repeated posts tend to shift the focus from the substance of your claims to the manner in which they are being made. This repetitive approach not only undermines the credibility of your evidence but also detracts from the possibility of meaningful dialogue.

4. Constructive Engagement vs. Emotional Rhetoric:
If the evidence you claim exists—such as the alleged “20 years of illegal crimes” or other misconduct—is as significant as you assert, presenting it once in a well-organized, fact-based report would be far more effective. Emotional and repetitive posts may generate noise, but they do little to convince others who are looking for clear, concise, and verifiable information.

5. Final Thoughts:
The purpose of community discussions is to work toward clarity and accountability by sharing credible, contextualized evidence. Spamming, as described by AbiOrionsson, is not just a minor infraction—it’s a behavior that hampers dialogue and runs counter to the community’s guidelines for respectful and constructive debate. If you want your claims to be taken seriously, consider consolidating your evidence into a structured argument that allows everyone to review and evaluate the facts on their own merits.

In short, while the issues you raise are serious and deserve attention, the method of repeatedly posting the same claims not only violates community rules but also detracts from the potential impact of your evidence. Let’s focus on fostering a transparent, evidence-based discussion rather than relying on repetitive, unverified assertions.