I know I partly repeat myself again, but this is just in case someone else decides to go on from this comment:
The standpoint I held during my argument with Squat was: The proof provided did not support calling JasonAfex a pedophile, and I won’t change my opinion about this point, as it specifically is about the proof provided.
Furthermore, it still counts (or at least I grew up with the rule), that the one who must provide evidence is the person accusing someone, not the person arguing against it.
This done, I must ask a genuine question:
What is meant with RCMP?
Because Google tells me it means “Royal Canadian Mounted Police” what I feel being the wrong address, though I do not know how scams on international level are handled. But I am pretty sure that the fake-rape-audio must be handed in by the victim (bleaksteadtler if I remember it correctly and didn’t miss more victims), though I have no idea when defamation becomes statute-barred in Canada.
Same goes for JasonAfex grooming Kabier and the first two pornographies Kabier voiced, if it can become statute-barred in Canada.
What happened between them after they moved in together, namely JasonAfex probably having sex with Kabier and them creating more pornographic animations might be useless to report with the age of consent in Canada being 16. (As both videos you linked under my other comment mentioned)
As far as I see for the rest I found information about, the only thing that do not need the victims to stand up, it would be the possible animal abuse (hinted by Kabier‘s deletet bestiality comic).
But as it’s probably already clear, I’m not really familiar with Canadian law and base this on what I know about laws in functioning democracies.