Thanks for the feedback Adzipl. I will go though your points one by one:
> the concept of units moving around and being able to join ongoing fights, and the possibility of 3-way (or maybe even more?) battles is absolutely cool
yes, it's more. There is no actual limit for number of parties in battle.
- graphics are servicable, yet very light on the computer.
> ragdoll physics are cool, possibly because killed characters do not go fully limp immediately...?
I have not implemented ragdoll physics yet. I use 20 different death animations.
what I did not like
- the so limited range on everything, and the lack of accuracy - I think that the "range compression" in this game goes way overboard, in my opinion, especially as weapons have absolutely-cut-off-range, out of which they cannot fire at all. I do not demand a simulation here, but when I see enemies firing from one square further that I can at me, and then dancing away, it looks just silly... also, the absolutely atrocious lack of accuracy when firing at anything past a few steps - it is hampering for the actual "tactics" aspect of the game, because, if the fight is in the open (which can often apply even in town battles), then both sides are forced to fire very inaccurately at each other, which basically nullifies any advantage which could be gained from smart Interrupts or firing first. We are supposed to be fighting with guns here, not knives. This goes double for any and all burst/autofire weapons - if they are not fired from adjacent space, bullets are spread around everywhere so much that it can't even be exploited for firing on, for example, bunched-up groups of enemies, yet, if they are fired from up close, one can bet on all the bullets hitting right on.
First off, the accuracy calculation in the current version is sub-optimal. The lower accuracy ratings were too inaccuate. I have already fixed that in the next version.
Bear in mind, that accuracy varies between 1-10. If your merc has an accuracy of 3 you should expect him to miss a lot of shots, because 3 means inaccurate. However, a soldier with 10 accuracy firing a weapon with 10 accuracy is nearly guaranteed to hit anything it shots at. Auto fire is more accurate in burst mode, or "fast burst" than full auto. Firing a MAC11 or RPK with fast burst at a group of enemies and you will normally hit a few of them.
> I'd say that increasing the range and on everything, reducing the effect of the range, but implementing the possibility of firing out of the range with a LARGE penalty to accuracy (like in old JA games) would work quite well.
Ok, I can try increasing range to a degree. But I don't see having a cut off range as a problem. When you attack enemies who have longer range weapons, that causes a dilemma, which the player must solve using tactics and that makes the game more interesting.
> Also, the target indicators over enemies should really show the approximate chance to hit by their colour - I hate seeing them all green, only for the shots to be basically wishful thinking.
The color of the target indicator only tells you how much of the target is behind cover, not the chance of hitting it. I could add hit chance as a number I suppose.
> (although I've noticed that hits, apart from HP loss and possible skill decreases, also have some short term effects on target's AP next turn. Mind elaborating on that?).
Yes, when a soldier is hit he temporarily loses some action points. Those action points are slowly recovered in following turns (the same as in JA)
> Also, do you plan on implementing something like "aimed shots", either old XCOM or JA-style?
I will consider it
> somewhat low damage/HP ratio in the game: taking all things into considering, the fact that the main character has a classic FPS hero's durability works quite well, but the enemies can also be weirdly tanky, and it can also hamper tactics, when you literally cannot eliminate that opponent as a threat. It feels more like playing old Fallout than XCOM or JA at this point.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "weirdly tanky"
> - maaybe some (limited, or more time-consuming) possibilities of HP recovery without having to go to Infirmaries would be nice...?
Yes, maybe in future versions.