Skip to main content

Browse GamesGame JamsUpload GameDeveloper LogsCommunity
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
CleanWater3 years ago (3 edits)

Wild-Dog, this is what Itch.io review system already do for developers. This system is a customer-to-developer only communication feature which avoid third parties to interfere with any bias on it. It's the perfect way to create strong customer-to-developer relationships. Honestly saying, I didn't got your point here.

Also, it's a customer right to have their money back if they dislike a product.

If developers don't create demos for their games, or don't know how to use these tools well to build a good audience, they are at fault here and should rethink their marketing strategy.

Reply
Wild-Dog3 years ago (1 edit)

Your point is that you want to throw away public reviews/comments because you think it blindsided your game.

Mine is that they can create a sense of trust and community that's invaluable for those who know how. They're also more reliable than refund systems and demos.

Reply
CleanWater3 years ago
Your point is that you want to throw away public reviews/comments because you think it blindsided your game.

Wild-Dog, why do you believe my point to be this?

Mine is that they can create a sense of trust and community that's invaluable for those who know how. They're also more reliable than refund systems and demos.

And why do you believe reviews that are open to public (and usually developers can't directly reply to them) can create a sense of trust between the community and developers?

Reply
Wild-Dog3 years ago

"A competitor dev published a negative review (which also affected my sales during the release) while promoting his own game on this same review." 

But if your games are actually good and you connect with players and make them feel heard, they'll sing your praises and outweigh the couple bad reviews. That's part of why public reviews can be so useful.

"(and usually developers can't directly reply to them)" So you agree they'd be better if they allowed a more open relationship between developer and player?

Reply
CleanWater3 years ago (3 edits)

Wild-Dog, I agree with you, but that's not what usually happens through open reviews from my own experience and observations.

Do you know how many downloads my games have? And how many of these persons never cared to rate my games? Saying they are bad are not an excuse, they could give a "poor rating" if it was the case. Most (actual) players don't use the rating system, or the review system either, from most stores.

Who really will benefit from this change?

Reply
Wild-Dog3 years ago

Sometimes games don't have that many reviews. That doesn't make them much less useful.

If I had interest in one of your games, I assure you I'd be far more likely to buy with 1 or 2 reviews even if one of them was bad than with none.

Same with products on amazon.

Reply
CleanWater3 years ago

Why do you think that way?

Reply
Wild-Dog3 years ago (1 edit) (+1)

Because there's no human or "honest" element without reviews. Without reviews, all there is is a box for the developer or company to toot their own horn.

If at-least one person (who doesn't sound like a bot) reviews a product, I instinctively feel better about the product and creator compared to without reviews.

Reply
CleanWater3 years ago

Wild-Dog, I understand your side and you have your rights to believe an open review system would be better. I respect it and I think this discussion won't take us anywhere, so I'm leaving it.

Have a nice week!

Reply
Wild-Dog3 years ago (1 edit)

Well it doesn't really matter if you understand, what matters is how many people feel the same way I do. But feel free to ignore that, maybe your game will do well even without considering your audience's concerns.

Reply
AboutFAQBlogContact us
Copyright © 2024 itch corp · Directory · Terms · Privacy · Cookies