Hello. I feel very conflicted about the description on your game page. I try to stay constructive when I leave comments, and I especially don't want to leave a negative comment on someone's page after they've left so many in depth positive comments on everyone else's.
But I don't even know how to perceive a piece without bias if I go into it after reading that you went into composing it to prove to yourself that a certain method of composition was worthless. Like, I don't even know what to say. I think upon hearing this on the soundcloud playlist at the beginning of judgement I found it somewhat generic, normally I would never say something like that on someone's page, I might even try and find something positive about the composition to comment on instead, but if that's what you were going for then... congratulations?
I doubt that all of the positive comments on your submission page here were from people who were just trying to spare your feelings. In this track, you've effortlessly achieved something that others aspire to. Maybe people want to make music like this and they don't know how, and you did it, and that takes skill, knowledge of music theory, a good ear, an understanding of pacing, what have you. And you're here being like all of that is just trash that sounds good. Which maybe? But... so dismissive. I feel like at least some of the other submissions here are the result of "playing with loops in a DAW" ... are they also all forgettable clones? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anyway, I doubt you really mean that, but I thought you might be interested in how your statement came across to me, in particular. I'm going to hold off on voting for this submission, I think I've already voted on your other one. Have a nice night!