"for being able to recognize a drawing as a kid"
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
You thinking a "drawing" is equivalent to a "real life kid" is absolutely demoralizing to actual victims of child abuse.
The only ones who would try hard to take attention away from real life issues to non-issue scapegoats like "pixels" are people that are "closet-pedos" like you who want to act morally high so, no one suspects them of anything.
Or maybe that's just your "closet-pedo" subjective view.
There are many adults who keep plushies as a comfort/decoration item including some who use them as a sex toy.
The fact that you see an adult who's short with big tits as a "kid" is really concerning since it is you who is ironically sexualizing kids.
Take your own advice an go to therapy because you really need it.
You're crying about pixels being somehow "wrong" when there are real world issues that you're severly downplaying here. It's not only disgusting but sad that you don't even realize how you're hurting real victims of child abuse by equalizing them the same as fictional characters.
You say this fictional character is made to look like a "kid" but please show me what "kid" in real life have such perfect proportion with massive bust? Yeah, none unless if you're a "closet-pedo" who tries to find a "kid" in everything.
You know morality and legality are two completely different things right? In the past, human slavery was completely legal.
In my country, pornography as a whole is banned, doesn't mean porn is somehow immoral just because the law is dumb.
Meanwhile in Japan, shotacon and lolicon is a normal thing so you'd be calling an entire country a "pedo" based on your dumb logic.
