Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
Deleted 1 year ago
(+3)(-1)

Socialism also allows right to property. I used Google to look it up:  

"While socialism calls for collective or shared ownership of the means of production, it does not imply that there is no private ownership of personal property. Thus, corporations and factories would be shared among the members of society, but individuals and households would still own their own personal effects." Source

I don't think anybody wants to share a communal toothbrush.

Deleted 1 year ago
(3 edits) (+1)(-1)

"Arbitrary" at best. Lmao yeah there's zero difference between owning a toothbrush and owning Amazon /s

That's why you've owned just as many Amazon's in your life as you have toothbrushes, right?

Deleted 1 year ago
(+2)(-1)

Imagine thinking you're so important that every socialist has to stop and address all your points.

You don't have anything original to say doofus. If people aren't answering you it's not because you're clever, it's because they've already heard it ten other times.

Deleted 1 year ago
(1 edit) (-1)

Just read Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism my man, it's not that hard

Deleted 1 year ago
(5 edits) (-1)

I don't recall kings ever doing anything to establish the dominant role of finance capital. Actually, it's pretty strange that you seem to think kings still had a major influence over society as late as 1914.

Or perhaps you need to get your eyes checked and make sure you read the correct title here