sound blew my ears out, but aside from that it was a fun little game. animation for the player was really smooth. would be great if there were more levels, and the volume sliders worked.
keyboard controls would be nice too.
Onyx Prism
Creator of
Recent community posts
I recommend Heels on Fire. Its great, and really funny! https://zahkros.itch.io/heels-on-fire
If it was a streamer not representing as a judge, I wouldn't have said a thing, because yes that is part of releasing a game, and expected.
I've been a part of many juried shows and I guess I just had a certain expectation of professionalism regarding judges.
Harsh criticism, yes. Direct insults towards whole groups of people while acting as a judge, no.
We can handle people being really mean, so I'm happy this happened to us and not some kid.
I wouldn't want them to get discouraged.
My stance is: Extreme bias in a judge is not good for a competition, because it causes competitors to lose faith in their chances and encourages researching judges and playing to what they like.
His personal opinion is totally fine, and we want to know things like that. it helps us understand where our market is.
Our point is that we don't care what he thinks of us.
This is not fair to others. He isn't judging, just insulting people and calling them c**buckets.
We know people won't like our game., that's fine.
This has nothing to do with our game, it has to do with fairness as a judge on other peoples games. That's why I posted this.
Someone clipped one of the worst parts.
https://www.twitch.tv/excessiveprofanity/clip/TenaciousEnergeticDootStoneLightni...
Hello, I'm the marketing and art person for our team. We submitted a game for the game jam, and recently one of the judges was streaming his votes. We have been harshly critiqued before and we welcome that (Godot showreel submission).
Our coder linked our game as ExcessiveProfanity was asking for games to judge.
What Zector (our coder) expected was constructive criticism. We love and welcome that, we want to be polarizing and understand that people may hate the games we make.
The issue I'm having after watching the stream of his reaction to our game, is the clear bias and insults towards people who play games like the one we made, and people who make those types of games. (not our first choice for a genre either).
Having been involved in organizing events for judging, I find that this is not fair to the other people that also entered the game jam.
Our game and consequently the others that are also in the same genre, are going to be not judged on their merits, but rather the judges' very open hatred for the genre, and possibly others too. Hating something is fine, but what he did crossed the line into nasty. Insults are not feedback.
Here is the link to the vod of the stream (can't timestamp) but it starts at 2hrs 36min, (2hrs 40 min is when it gets nasty)
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2047010076
I am not writing this in any way to attempt to change our score. We know we won't win, and for us winning is not the point. Our goal was to learn and get better at what we do.
I am writing this for the other teams in the jam as I feel that this judge is not judging games on their merit but rather through bias, and that is not fair for a competition, especially when 30k is on the line. The winner deserves to win by their merit and not by the bias of a judge.
The movement and animations feel really, really nice. I like the spell cast mechanic its different. However it seems harder to cast fire than frost.
I did get stuck and didn't know what to do, and I feel like I soft locked myself in with the goo.
It wasn't clear in game what the spell casts purpose was, but it did look pretty :)
Music starts out loud and would have like a volume slider.
The sound effects are nice and fit with everything.
Reading the other comments helped and I'll try the game again to see if I can get farther :)
Over all good job !
thank you, thank you, thank you, for making nice feeling controls!!
Its usually so over looked, but so important.