Classic, it's been so long since I've seen this game..
subtext
Creator of
Recent community posts
Curious to see how different the beats that people made are..
R3N23:44
15-10-2024C1L0H0I0Q1M0S0K0T0,1.46,2.49,3.94,5.41,6.4T5.03,7.01,0.99,3.02I1Q1M0S0K0T3.9,4.5,5.01,5.52,5.94,6.44,7.01T3.48,7.49T0,0.46,0.98,1.49,2.01,2.52,3.01I2Q1M0S0K0T0,3.98T0.48,1.51,2.56,3.54T4.56,5.5,6.51,7.53I3Q1M0S0K0T2.5,6.5T1.98,3.57T4.01,5.99I4Q1M0S2K2T0,1.52,3.03T7.78,5.56T7.61,4,6.93T7.51I5Q1M0S0K0T0.04,1.53,3.02,3.92,5.48,7.01T0.04,1.53,3.02T3.92,5.48T7I6Q1M0S0K0T4.03,4.51,5.07,5.54,6.06,6.53,7.07,7.5T0.06,0.53,1.06,1.59,2.06,2.56,3.07,3.54T0.04,0.53,1.06,1.58,2.06,2.56,3.07,3.54T4.06,4.51,5.07,5.54,6.07,6.55,7.07,7.51I7Q1M0S0K0T3.48,4.02,7.49,0T5.03,6.99,1.04,3.03
Okay, played it! Good work - particularly the soundscape helps to create the world. Just a note - Blood in the Machine is a book about the luddites. People today think they were anti technology, but it's actually a successful labor movement that was later smeared to make them look scared of technology. I don't personally think anti-technology is what we want - we want to control the use of technology, not give up on it just because it's used to maximize profit under our current society. Games can help us imagine that future.
Interesting! I definitely tried to observe that dual targeting behavior, but the behavior was similar enough to when people were targeted alone, I didn't notice. Something that might make this more of a reasonable discovery is if I could tell myself a story about what is happening.
As it is, the drones seem to be able to independently target multiple targets independently, so it's unclear why a new target would require the initial rectangle to get bigger.. But if there was a way to communicate that the drone system has some kind of "switching-cost" when there is a second target, then that could be effective in allowing the user to intuit what's going on.
As an example solution, perhaps the red box pauses for a fraction of a second and changes to a more transparent color when a secondary target appears, giving the appearance of being "inactive" while new targeting is happening, and then resuming the shrinking. This could be intuited as extra processing time required. It might even work without the transparency effect.. Anyways, just some thoughts, nice work!
Cool idea! But I don't think that continuing to seek appeasement would result in the USSR launching nukes.. My understanding is that the positioning of nuclear weapons in Cuba was because of the US installing nuclear missiles in Turkey.. So I'd expect a negotiated peace route to result in Krushchev requesting their removal.. Which is essentially what happened anyways but with more brinkmanship in between.
Nice - I see that the removal of the missiles from Turkey are included in the correct ending.. though in the game as in real life, it's unclear why all the other posturing was needed..
Nice - I like how this game changes over time, and remains tense up till the end.. Was really satisfying turning my meadows into farms and turning into a more self sustaining country - I really felt that dynamic! There's really a feel of holding off these forces, hoping to out last them. Great stuff!
Refugees and Operation Dragoon seem to be critical cards (I see them in the Menu) but they never show up in the game - I tested this out by just discarding every turn and sure enough they didn't show. Without these it's impossible to hold back the Axis Allies or win.. Is there some hidden rule here, after which they'll be unlocked?
Having a hard time with this one! One thing that's challenging for me is that it's very hard to figure out what's going on.
Right now, if a UAV is destroyed, we get very little information about what happened. If we at least got the location of the UAV that was destroyed that would be great, but would love to get more info on what actually destroyed it. Like I know I'm outside reach of an air strip, but it would be great to know 100% that my mental model matches what the game is doing.
Sometimes my habitats seemed to be killed by ships that were within one range, even when I had surrounded my habitat with UAVs and mines. If that's true, then I'm completely puzzled about how that's possible and what to do about that.
I gave up trying to defend my Heavy Lift Ships, since it seemed like no matter how I positioned UAVs and mines, there was no way to protect them from being destroyed (and this was after I made sure I was 7 hexes away from airstrips). So now I just move them along the top of the map.
Something that could help is making the process for moving thing faster. So far, I'm moving all my ships together and it takes 12 clicks just to move 4 ships to one hex. Would love it if there was a shortcut to move all, or if the ship was autoselected when tapping the hex at least.
So I'd say here's my situation:
1. I don't know the cause of my habitats/ships dying.
2. So I don't get good information about what I'm doing wrong or how I can change up to do better next time.
3. Meaning I have to do a lot of random experiments to see try and find a strategy that doesn't obviously suck.
4. It's slow to take actions, so this whole process takes a lot of time, and I end up playing "lets see what happens if" games where I, for instance, just leave the Cable Layer's and Heavy Lift Ships alone while I see if the UAVs can find any enemy ships.
Hope this is helpful!
The sequence leading up to the evening is great, and feels like a real world..
Since I was already familiar with the story of the monkey's paw, I didn't much care for a an exact retelling, which didn't seem to fit the world you had built.. Maybe that could have worked if it integrated more into the world - perhaps an alien artifact and with a different sequence of events than the monkey's paw story. But is this thematically important to the father's life? I'd be more interested in why the cats are doing bizarre things, is there something agitating them? Is there some mystery involving the company the son works at?
Great voice acting and art, would definitely play another game that takes place in the same world.
Oh and it just occurred to me, the monkey's paw is definitely a convenient way for the company to avoid blame for dangerous work conditions. Yeah they are totally liable.
Nice! I enjoyed the process as always - steep learning curve while figuring out a strategy that's not terrible, and then tweaking until I found the dominant strategy, with -0.6 degree change and -755 Co2 and 9 geo-engineering. Very satisfying!
I've been playing Scythe lately, and I really love how there's negative feedback loops built into the game - like you can make more workers, but the cost of using the workers goes up dramatically as you expand your workforce, meaning there's an incentive to keeping your labor force smaller.
I wonder if there is some cost to having too many activists? My winning strategies at the moment were to get as many activists as possible into local government to base build, but I can imagine my ability to build a base could be limited if I'm focusing on recruitment at the expense of getting any wins.
Anyways, good stuff, and I like that you're trying out this different configuration!
Hey I'm curious - do you have a process for researching historical events for these games? Like do you read a book on the topic? Or watch documentaries? Or just via internet? How do you decide what goes in the game and what gets cut? What gets represented in the game play and what doesn't? Would love to hear the process for getting this level of understanding of the relationships between orgs and interest groups and the curation process!
Sure enough, got a total victory in 27 turns.. This one is definitely fun to see how quickly it can be done.. It really is about making an efficient machine. Even though the gameplay is a bit on the mundane side once you've figured out the process and neutralized the enemy, there's a certain geeky fun in getting the timing right and switching your machine from a resource generating machine to a war machine. I could probably trim down a few turns by switching a bit earlier (stock piled 39 resources this time around before switching.. 35 probably would of been fine).. But probably not motivated to go through it again to do that..
Nice simulation!
Total victory in 36 turns! That was a challenging one to adopt to.. Was losing a lot before I found my way.. Began to realize that the military and infiltration blockers always rose to the top and that it's not too hard to completely disable the enemy, just need to get rid of those cruise missiles.. Then I optimized my play by really getting into the deck building component - not being so quick to pick up cards, and thinning out cards that were not useful (or no longer useful) for my strategy with the EU.. When the time came to run through Donbas, I was a well oiled machine, making sure to stockpile resources before starting the combat.
There was really an aspect of optimizing the machine for different purposes - first I was just trying to survive and put up a solid defense, then I had to build resources, and finally go to war.. Probably could even do a bit better with those last 2 phases.. tempted to try again!
Liking this so far! Just a quick note as I play: Looks like you can play a sigint card, and then undo last move, and repeatedly play it to get all the intel for free! After undoing the intel remains on the card. Same thing with Diplomacy - you can remove an enemy card, and then undo - the diplomacy card returns, but the enemy card is gone. Sometimes with EU Support too.. I'll note this seems to be inconsistent - I just played sigint and it now won't let me undo it.. So maybe this only works under certain conditions.
K I guess this is a general problem - was just able to use it with Harpoon ARMs and completely take out the black sea..
That said, even with some of the advantage from the glitch, having a hard time besting the computer at this!
Really well thought out! Very targeted, strategic ideas around apply pressure to businesses, the court system, local government, and law enforcement in order to bring back and strengthen democratic systems..
Found myself using mass protests to fight back national guard defensives.. Found I only needed the slightest support from the general public and the courts, and usually only at strategic times..
I'm seeing a theme of applying targeted pressure towards the groups that advance the immediate goals rather than wasting time spreading around focus.. Accomplish one big push and the switch focus before devoting resources elsewhere..
Here I found an optimal strategy pretty quickly and found I could ignore just about everything else. This felt unfortunate given the interesting sounding dynamics between foreign and domestic actors, marxists and slave owners, etc. Also, I landed myself 2 ironclad producing cards which felt ridiculously overpowered, and allowed me to further focus my play.
It made it so when the card "abolish slavery" came around, I was like, "That sounds interesting, butttt right now I need to guns so I can fend off the confederacy and amass enough to do a series of surprise attacks."
But maybe that's part of the lesson? When you've got a violent force that's constantly threatening to move in on your land and shut down your economy, and stop you from defending yourself (cotton -> legitimacy, legitimacy -> conscription -> guns), the push and pull of domestic and international interests is largely irrelevant.
This is pretty interesting! But it's barely playable due to the fact that the controls are all backwards when you start playing.. I get the idea there, but I don't think it actually goes with your game's theme - it's not like people going in reverse in tenet actually had to walk themselves backwards to move forward. So this concept doesn't actually pay off in any way, it's just frustrating and awkward.
Besides, I think you have something interesting here, walking around shooting the bullet in the gun is a concept I haven't seen before, and I suspect would be interesting and challenging with standard controls.
If the controls were changed, I'd be interested to explore what you've created here more - I am definitely curious about what normal time will be like.. I'm wondering if I'll see my character running around doing everything I did.. Sounds really cool!
Glad it's helpful! I'll add that the challenge of decoding the abbreviations and separating the signal from the noise was definitely a part of the appeal to playing this.. Here are the notes that helped me develop the intuition to arrive at a solution:
Mi-14PL (Helicopter) E Electronic Warfare Air + Surface M Magnetic Anomaly Detector Undersea (50% if right on top of) Skinny Rocket NASMS surface-to-air P Phased Array Radar Air (r6) Surface (100, 100) Drone TB2 UAV O Optical Sensors Surface/Mobile (50, 25, 16) Air base T Na(T)o Intelligence Undersea (15% all over)
Thanks for making these games! I really don't play a lot of games these days, but there's something particularly unique about what you're creating here.. Probably it's the degree of depth, and the way in which the games pull their details from reality - so learning about the game is also learning about details from the world, which feels more worthwhile than just learning best strategies for beating a normal game.
I'll also say, these are the first Hex based games dealing with this scale (zoomed out to the level of nationstate) I've played .. I'd be curious to hear about games that inspire you that you'd recommend. Thanks!
For this one I felt a bit like a new commander, just out of Commander school and thrown into combat, forced to evaluate everything taught in textbooks, to pick out what matters on the battle field. The real challenge here is separating what you need to know from what you don't need to know. There are so many different sensors with so many different affects on so many different units it can be overwhelming, but once you reduce the list just to the elements which are relevant for this scenario, it slowly becomes comprehendible. Not easy mind you.. I took me a few play throughs to eke out a minor victory, and many restarts before I figured out all the bad ideas, and finally developed a fairly solid strategy. I was pleased to find the AI of some of the units seemingly intelligent - the migs seem to behave a bit like a swarm of bees.. I could lead them alone, and they seemed happy to protect their objective, but as soon as I tried to eliminate them, they became unpredictable, costing me a couple wins even as I started feeling experienced..
This was the first naval hex game of this collection that I committed to completing, I imagine some of the skills I picked up will be transferable to the other naval games, so looking forward to trying those out too.
Nice work!