Judge feedback

Judge feedback is anonymous.

• GDD: GDD seems good. Good with the images in game mechanics section. Perhaps showcase more art in art section. Like the card and the thought behind the design. If I had to nitpick; add an development timeline would showcase transparency of the game's state and progress. It gives so much value to the GDD. Game: The intro to main menu feels good. Nice. Nice to see settings, but think it could be improved with accessibilties settings and perhaps some gameplay settings. Card glossary is godsend for those who want to learn the cards, but I would rather use grid based than a list for this UI. Think of like pokemon cards binders! A minor detail, but rather called it quit button (for example when I am in card glossary page), perhaps call it back button or return to main menu button. Another minor detail but I like the animated hover effect on the cards in main menu and the scene transitions. The story goes too fast for the average player to follow along. Perhaps slow down or give the player the choice to go to next step of the story. I think it is a good idea that the player can pick a deck that suited their playstyle by buying different cards, but this need to communicated to the player beforehands. The game need a tutorial in order to understand the card system. Perhaps also update some more UI that communicated properly to the player, so it is easier to understand the game. Think of slay the spire or balatro as examples. The reason they are doing so well are because their UI are very much communicated to the average player. In the core of these card games, the better communicated the game is, the easier it is for "the blind player" to actually understood of the game. Dont worry about the game is not in perfect state, but do keep in mind this review is focused on the few game mechanics and game design aspect of the game. Bug: * sometimes during card "combat" phase, I keep seeing dead cards that respawned in my hand and disappeared after awhile. Kinda like zombie cards.