Post by ElPresidente in Aric's Expansion Rebred

Viewing post in Aric's Expansion Rebred

If the partner is futa, move the sexuality to middle? That could work. A futa is certainly more feminine than masculine.

Also, balless futas do not trigger the cum actions (partenr wishes to taste cum, if you cum in mount, it's not registered). It appears as they do not produce cum at all. Why not simply make the "balless" futa have internal balls? Code-wise, the only difference between a balless futa and a futa with balls would be the description.

AricTriton5 years ago

The biggest reasoning on that was the assumption that ball-less futa lovers would prefer not to have semen. That may end up being another option to toggle to provide further customization. That's one of those "not really my fetish so just kind of guessing what people want" situations.

ElPresidente5 years ago

That makes no sense. Balless futa do have and always did have semen, otherwise they wouldn't be able to impregenate - it is even sated in the description that they have internal testicles.

AricTriton5 years ago

I responded without actually checking my script. I had already applied a check to apply a base cum production of 1 to Futa without balls, but it was never triggering because of an Or instead of And check in the previous check which was only applying based on the ball size (which was obviously 0).

Fixed in 07.1

itch.io

Viewing post in Aric's Expansion Rebred