Over my lunch hour I was putting together a spreadsheet that could help. If I get more time today I should be able to finish it. I have been just visually checking for source code and downloading a file zip files when I wasn't sure.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e5bgjJy-sc6K-B05iCOd5n58M8akQNC89M7Hf9mx...
Having just a link t a GitHub repository is fine, IMO it's the preferred way of distributing source code (or GitLab or Bitbucket or any repository). I like to checkout the source with Git, and maybe contribute fixes when relevant.
So you definitely don't need to remove the link to your GitHub project. Adding a ZIP of the source code in its jam state to itch.io is fine too.
I've asked all projects with a "N" on that list to provide source code if they want to be eligible for winning the jam.
I know that CowThing can't provide the source code for Frog Smith as they did a blunder when trying to upload it to GitHub and deleted it locally before it was pushed online (allegedly, but CowThing did provide source code for their previous jam entries - winning two Godot jams - so I tend to trust them). Rules are rules though so we'll have to exclude Frog Smith from the final ratings.
Thanks for checking, I only did a visual check and didn't have time to actually check everyone for source code. I looked at the Going to Grandmas and the source is in the downloads. As for Idiots on the Line you are correct, the repository is pretty bare, there are two files in there but nothing else really. So I have updated both with comments and for now changed the one to a N
Those games now have source code provided and could turn to Y's:
- https://aegide.itch.io/cherenkov-overdrive
