Nice to see you haven't changed. Is it really too much for you to be cordial, or at the very least civil? Anyways, it's impressive that you can send that amount of text and be so vapid; over half of what was sent in that reply holds nothing to do with what's being discussed. And the rest? Well...
Fine, let's talk about this data and conclusion of yours. Yes, you've provided more data than I; but I haven't had any relevant need to do so, as it isn't necessary for my point in this discussion. I'll restate my point once more, in clear wording: life happens, have patience. Your data has been good; listing out dates for the release cycles of other updates. The information provided hasn't been the issue against your point. The problem thus lies in your conclusion and examination of said data: it's superficial and based on assumption. Why? The situation surrounding this update is unprecedented for the game, which means the normal cycle is currently broken. But that is by no means an excuse to come to this wildly outrageous assumption that the game is canceled (secretly canceled?).
I don't have any reason beyond curiosity to hold this discussion with you, I have even less reason to stand the flagrantly insulting attitude of someone unwilling to hold a reasonable conversation; however, I didn't want to step on a Lego with my fossil of a body. I'll be looking forward to your response, however, you've burned through much of my remaining goodwill, so you won't be entitled to a response unless something interesting comes up. I hope you have a lovely evening.