Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

Yeah, there'll be more feedback about how the techniques worked out for you. We're still trying to figure out what the best way of presenting the information is.

Having things fully working as-is, barring future improvements, is going to be as much as possible our approach from here on in - we did have to do some rapid prototyping early on which led to some of that "insert working stuff here" scaffolding that you're seeing. In my experience in software development in general, you shouldn't push out half-baked things - either something is done or it's not done, and if it's not done, users shouldn't be seeing it. It's a good rule of thumb in general, and in a future project especially, but even as we continue on with this one, we're going to try to apply it.

That said, if we don't have any placeholders, it becomes nearly impossible to tell what direction the game will be moving in. If we had started off with only techniques that had their underlying systems implemented... well, there would be very few of them, and you wouldn't even see the stance system working at all. We're going to do a ton of iteration, and if we had things our way, we wouldn't be showing development this early to anyone... but that's also a lie, because the only reason we've been able to get as much as we have done has been because of feedback, positive and negative, and support that this initial roll-out has (somewhat unintentionally) brought us.

We had actually considered retreating out of public view for a while to release a "public" demo once we reached version 0.2.00, which would be at that "everything is in place and we're fleshing things out" stage that you mentioned. That was our original plan once the game jam was over, but we were pretty surprised by the response we got, and were seeing a lot of people that had come to expect the frequently updated public builds.

It's hard to say what approach will work best - everyone has a different expectation of where we are in the project, which is understandable, but if you think we're at the 90% mark vs. the 20% mark, you're going to see a very different game. I think it would be good if we put together a roadmap, and we've actually started to post pieces of that on our Patreon page publicly; we might compile it and flesh it out and post it as a sticky here in this forum, so that those who are interested know what to look out for and expect, and, if something is missing that they think should be in, to have an opportunity to let us know about it.

I will say that we are learning a ton from this, and as we center in on a more defined plan for this project, we're also keeping it in mind as a template for any future game projects to come. :D

Glad to hear it.

I agree that in general, things shouldn't be shown unless it's well under way. It's how we get projects that severely under deliver (coughnomansskycough) based on expectations and hype.

BUT at the same time, testing and public feedback is very important--especially for a small or new team who are still getting their bearings. Nintendo has in-company QA as well as long standing, very experienced members, who can make these sorts of decisions and calls by instinct alone. But ya'll ain't no Nintendo. (if you were i'd be expecting way more Rosalina and Samus)

But I think you guys have handled it in stride, and considering how it's been going, I think it's overall been a good investment. I think at this point, to kind of "retreat" wouldn't do much anymore, except make people worry and help nurture procrastination.

Do the roadmap thing. Conceptualize everything you want to do, and then zero in on what's realistic, and think about just how long you want to be making this. I'm sure you already know all of this, just saying. You're doin' the right things.

Keep it up.