itch.io

We don’t have to follow how it’s “typically” done. Of course the aim is to do it properly and actually reflects the intent to make our software accessible at comparable rates across the globe.

Right now my software is only accessible in wealthy countries, which is a shame.

But without it it’s discriminatory to ALL people in poor countries.

Of course within a country there are differences, but I don’t want to force people from a region where there are orders of magnitude different purchasing power to pay a relatively insane amount of money for my products.

I hope you understand that it doesn’t make any sense for those cases.

Calling this “rotten” makes you look like a heartless fool.

But sure I agree that this would need some proper tuning to apply correctly. It’s a good practice if applied sensibly, imo. And I believe that the current global flat rate is senseless.

Can you explain what you think is “rotten” about this?

Purchasing power is objectively different in other regions, but you want to force people with low income to pay significantly higher prices? (in some cases orders of magnitude different)

I don’t get it.

I’d love to see regional pricing!

While I think my products are fairly priced for my local region, for other parts of the world they might be considered expensive. I’ve already seen some clandestine distribution of the binaries, so it would be great to be able to provide more affordable options for those regions.

Derp! that button is so easy to miss since there are 5 big red buttons all stacked on top of each other!

I wanted to add this according to https://itch.io/t/276900/creating-a-custom-favicon

But after I upload a square image (tried different sizes) it’s only briefly shown on the edit page. After reloading the edit page it is gone again.

Have a look at blamscamp and scritch-player projects that provide such functionality:

https://github.com/blackle/blamscamp

https://github.com/torcado194/scritch-player

When I try to connect to the account I get a This app is blocked warning:

No problem!

I think the issue had something to do with audio. Somehow the ALSA implementation is broken. On another computer (exactly the same OS, except it has a different audio setup) everything works!

Hmm, getting a segmentation fault. Where do I best share a stack trace?

No worries, donating isn’t mandatory. Although of course appreciated!

Linux build when? :)

Oh, I have plenty of reasons against Flatpak :)

Unnecessary duplication of system dependencies, audio tools not able to use system paths for opening files (like package manager installed plugins) to unreasonable devs that don’t take input from upstream developers, maintainers or users.

Call me a boomer, but I prefer the “traditional” way of building, installing and running applications and packages :)

Btw afaik a flatpak won’t help with the glibc issue.

Oh, I tried building it myself and ran into SDL version errors since you require 2.0.17+

Oh well ..

Please consider building for a bit older Linux systems (say Ubuntu 20.04 or Debian 11/stable) as your glibc version is too new for those.

Also consider statically compiling so that there is no/less conflict with dependencies.

Why doesn't your fork on GH correspond to the original repository?
It's pretty much impossible to get your changes merged into the original project now.

When will you have a Linux build?

y u no linux?

Unless there is some windows-specific dependency I'd prefer a native build.

I wish this ran on linux.

vst2/3 supports it, so yeah this would be great!

However the project that these plugins have been made with is deprecated .. so a port to iPlug2 ?

ahw. not even the 1Ghz?

Linux version?

Too bad, there's quite some potential for a tool like this. Both for education and actual prototyping/design.

Gave you a donation anyway, hope you reconsider (development, or open-sourcing) one day. Would be a shame if your work went to waste.