Skip to main content

On Sale: GamesAssetsToolsTabletopComics
Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines
A jam submission

Roll With ItView game page

A one button physics puzzler
Submitted by Autoquark, nhahn, IanBadcoe — 1 hour, 29 minutes before the deadline
Add to collection

Play game

Roll With It's itch.io page

Results

CriteriaRankScore*Raw Score
Overall#43.4883.900
Technical Implementation#63.6904.125
Music/Sound#73.2423.625
Fun/Design#83.4663.875
Theme/Limitation#83.8014.250
Graphics/Animation#93.2423.625

Ranked from 8 ratings. Score is adjusted from raw score by the median number of ratings per game in the jam.

How does your game utilize the limitation and theme?
The movement of the balls and their interaction with the static and moving parts of each level is driven by rigidbody physics. The player's only input is to press a switch which 'switches' the level between two different states.

Team Size

Trio (3)

Engine

Unity

Which diversifiers did you use, if any?
Arguably a one-button game, excluding menu and camera controls

Leave a comment

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

Comments

Submitted(+2)

Great how the switch mechanic was implemented. Very easy to understand and the atmosphere was great. The camera controls were a tiny bit hard but most of the levels were fine at the starting camera position. Such a cool game!  

Submitted(+2)

Although it took me a little time to get adjusted to the game, it was real fun manipulating all the platforms and using the switch. Good job!

Submitted(+2)

Nice one, I really liked the ambience. Cool puzzles too. The second to last one was particularly cool how you had to purposefully drop one of the balls. Really cool idea.

Submitted(+2)

Simple and easy to understand mechanic with interesting level design.

Submitted(+2)

The switch is a clever idea, tho the game can be a bit frustrating at times

HostSubmitted(+1)

Hey! Just an FYI, your game page is inaccessible (could be private?)

Developer(+1)

Whoops, was sure I'd changed that. Thanks!