210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #75 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Overall | #141 | 2.530 | 2.530 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #149 | 2.700 | 2.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #161 | 1.950 | 1.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #189 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #135 | 2.818 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #144 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #144 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #147 | 2.467 | 2.627 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #149 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #163 | 1.941 | 2.067 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #146 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #146 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #163 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #164 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #166 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #143 | 2.572 | 3.750 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #161 | 2.144 | 3.125 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #163 | 2.487 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #163 | 2.315 | 3.375 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #165 | 1.886 | 2.750 |
| Overall | #165 | 2.281 | 3.325 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #108 | 3.059 | 3.059 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #116 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #134 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #139 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #166 | 1.882 | 1.882 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #167 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #172 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Overall | #179 | 2.053 | 3.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #181 | 2.108 | 3.286 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #181 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #135 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #155 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #156 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #157 | 2.365 | 3.686 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #167 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #157 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #167 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #170 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #170 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Overall | #173 | 2.127 | 3.314 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #190 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #170 | 1.801 | 2.625 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #175 | 2.229 | 3.250 |
| Overall | #183 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #184 | 2.144 | 3.125 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #185 | 1.715 | 2.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #187 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #112 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #151 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Overall | #156 | 2.388 | 2.388 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #160 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #171 | 1.765 | 1.765 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #127 | 2.910 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #142 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #147 | 2.547 | 2.625 |
| Overall | #153 | 2.425 | 2.500 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #163 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #172 | 1.758 | 1.813 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #164 | 2.304 | 2.375 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #165 | 2.486 | 2.563 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #172 | 1.758 | 1.813 |
| Overall | #175 | 2.110 | 2.175 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #178 | 1.819 | 1.875 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #179 | 2.183 | 2.250 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #68 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #126 | 2.650 | 2.650 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #131 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Overall | #131 | 2.750 | 2.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #174 | 1.750 | 1.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #125 | 2.658 | 4.143 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #133 | 2.842 | 4.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #155 | 2.420 | 3.771 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #170 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #176 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
| Overall | #180 | 1.998 | 3.114 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #194 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #141 | 2.750 | 4.286 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #157 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Overall | #164 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #159 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #186 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #186 | 1.907 | 2.971 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #190 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #192 | 1.558 | 2.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #133 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #137 | 2.889 | 2.889 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #150 | 2.611 | 2.611 |
| Overall | #152 | 2.433 | 2.433 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #156 | 2.222 | 2.222 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #179 | 1.722 | 1.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #180 | 1.687 | 2.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #186 | 1.994 | 2.600 |
| Overall | #190 | 1.733 | 2.260 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #194 | 1.764 | 2.300 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #196 | 1.457 | 1.900 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #197 | 1.764 | 2.300 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #155 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #181 | 1.650 | 2.571 |
| Overall | #185 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #186 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #187 | 1.650 | 2.571 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #188 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
