210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #84 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #108 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Overall | #118 | 2.908 | 2.908 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #119 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #124 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #141 | 2.292 | 2.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #136 | 2.668 | 3.667 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #142 | 2.264 | 3.111 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #161 | 2.345 | 3.222 |
| Overall | #162 | 2.312 | 3.178 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #169 | 2.425 | 3.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #175 | 1.859 | 2.556 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #140 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #143 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Overall | #149 | 2.455 | 2.613 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #149 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #153 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #159 | 2.442 | 2.600 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #65 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #82 | 3.571 | 4.250 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #85 | 3.361 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #90 | 3.207 | 3.817 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #144 | 2.240 | 2.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #141 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #145 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #161 | 2.328 | 3.629 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #170 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #139 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #139 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #141 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
| Overall | #144 | 2.482 | 2.482 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #146 | 2.176 | 2.176 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #146 | 2.176 | 2.176 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #166 | 2.059 | 2.059 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Overall | #171 | 2.200 | 2.200 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #178 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #181 | 2.176 | 2.176 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #148 | 2.148 | 2.800 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #149 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #151 | 2.684 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #154 | 2.424 | 3.160 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #155 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #155 | 2.224 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #131 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #142 | 2.517 | 2.680 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #149 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #150 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #178 | 2.192 | 2.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #144 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #149 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #153 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #158 | 2.342 | 2.493 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #159 | 2.192 | 2.333 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #172 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #145 | 2.668 | 2.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #151 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Overall | #167 | 2.243 | 2.313 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #167 | 2.001 | 2.063 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #176 | 2.304 | 2.375 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #183 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #152 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #160 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Overall | #168 | 2.224 | 2.224 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #170 | 1.941 | 1.941 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #152 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #160 | 2.353 | 2.353 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
| Overall | #178 | 2.094 | 2.094 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #181 | 1.765 | 1.765 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #185 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #136 | 2.454 | 3.200 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #154 | 2.071 | 2.700 |
| Overall | #160 | 2.332 | 3.040 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #165 | 2.378 | 3.100 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #166 | 2.301 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #168 | 2.454 | 3.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #155 | 2.067 | 2.200 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #173 | 1.879 | 2.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #174 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| Overall | #181 | 1.991 | 2.120 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #192 | 1.879 | 2.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #192 | 1.816 | 1.933 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #134 | 2.486 | 2.563 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #136 | 2.668 | 2.750 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #148 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Overall | #151 | 2.437 | 2.513 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #156 | 2.062 | 2.125 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #175 | 2.243 | 2.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #157 | 2.058 | 3.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #167 | 2.315 | 3.375 |
| Overall | #174 | 2.127 | 3.100 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #175 | 2.315 | 3.375 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #179 | 2.144 | 3.125 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #179 | 1.801 | 2.625 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #158 | 2.017 | 3.143 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #162 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Overall | #172 | 2.182 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #182 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #159 | 2.001 | 2.063 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #171 | 1.940 | 2.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #183 | 2.183 | 2.250 |
| Overall | #184 | 1.952 | 2.013 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #190 | 1.880 | 1.938 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #195 | 1.758 | 1.813 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #117 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #134 | 2.830 | 4.125 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #138 | 2.658 | 3.875 |
| Overall | #140 | 2.590 | 3.775 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #147 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #160 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
