211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #1 | 4.426 | 4.426 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #3 | 4.298 | 4.298 |
| Overall | #5 | 4.191 | 4.191 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #6 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #8 | 4.021 | 4.021 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #10 | 4.170 | 4.170 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #2 | 4.406 | 4.406 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #30 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #33 | 3.763 | 3.763 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #44 | 3.688 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #46 | 3.844 | 3.844 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #69 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 4.320 | 4.320 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #1 | 4.514 | 4.514 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #1 | 4.429 | 4.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #2 | 4.486 | 4.486 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #3 | 4.400 | 4.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #22 | 3.771 | 3.771 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #2 | 4.310 | 4.310 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #3 | 4.483 | 4.483 |
| Overall | #4 | 4.228 | 4.228 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #4 | 4.379 | 4.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #10 | 4.103 | 4.103 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #19 | 3.862 | 3.862 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #2 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Overall | #3 | 4.244 | 4.244 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #5 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #7 | 4.028 | 4.028 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #13 | 4.139 | 4.139 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #5 | 4.171 | 4.171 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #6 | 4.343 | 4.343 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #6 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #8 | 4.126 | 4.126 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #9 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #26 | 3.714 | 3.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #4 | 4.435 | 4.435 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #4 | 4.174 | 4.174 |
| Overall | #7 | 4.178 | 4.178 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #7 | 4.283 | 4.283 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #10 | 3.978 | 3.978 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #14 | 4.022 | 4.022 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #1 | 4.514 | 4.514 |
| Overall | #2 | 4.259 | 4.259 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #3 | 4.189 | 4.189 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #3 | 4.135 | 4.135 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #7 | 4.189 | 4.189 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #8 | 4.270 | 4.270 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #4 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #9 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
| Overall | #10 | 4.045 | 4.045 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #21 | 3.825 | 3.825 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #35 | 3.925 | 3.925 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #4 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #5 | 4.350 | 4.350 |
| Overall | #6 | 4.180 | 4.180 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #7 | 4.025 | 4.025 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #8 | 4.025 | 4.025 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #10 | 4.225 | 4.225 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #6 | 4.316 | 4.316 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #11 | 4.211 | 4.211 |
| Overall | #12 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #16 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #27 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #28 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #7 | 4.265 | 4.265 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #8 | 4.163 | 4.163 |
| Overall | #9 | 4.082 | 4.082 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #12 | 4.204 | 4.204 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #15 | 3.939 | 3.939 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #20 | 3.837 | 3.837 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #13 | 4.176 | 4.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #14 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #19 | 3.929 | 3.929 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #22 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #11 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #14 | 4.148 | 4.148 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #23 | 3.815 | 3.815 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #23 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #25 | 3.852 | 3.852 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #12 | 4.050 | 4.050 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #15 | 4.100 | 4.100 |
| Overall | #24 | 3.850 | 3.850 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #10 | 3.952 | 3.952 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #16 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Overall | #17 | 3.952 | 3.952 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #18 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #20 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #35 | 3.762 | 3.762 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #6 | 4.038 | 4.038 |
| Overall | #14 | 3.985 | 3.985 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #17 | 3.868 | 3.868 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #22 | 3.906 | 3.906 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #26 | 3.849 | 3.849 |
| Overall | #31 | 3.777 | 3.777 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #36 | 3.623 | 3.623 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #52 | 3.302 | 3.302 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #9 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
| Overall | #13 | 3.996 | 3.996 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #14 | 3.885 | 3.885 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #15 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #19 | 4.058 | 4.058 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #4 | 4.115 | 4.115 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
| Overall | #15 | 3.977 | 3.977 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #20 | 4.038 | 4.038 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #32 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
