211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #1 | 4.514 | 4.514 |
| Overall | #2 | 4.259 | 4.259 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #3 | 4.189 | 4.189 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #3 | 4.135 | 4.135 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #7 | 4.189 | 4.189 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #8 | 4.270 | 4.270 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 4.320 | 4.320 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #1 | 4.514 | 4.514 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #1 | 4.429 | 4.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #2 | 4.486 | 4.486 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #3 | 4.400 | 4.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #22 | 3.771 | 3.771 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #2 | 4.310 | 4.310 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #3 | 4.483 | 4.483 |
| Overall | #4 | 4.228 | 4.228 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #4 | 4.379 | 4.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #10 | 4.103 | 4.103 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #19 | 3.862 | 3.862 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #4 | 4.435 | 4.435 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #4 | 4.174 | 4.174 |
| Overall | #7 | 4.178 | 4.178 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #7 | 4.283 | 4.283 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #10 | 3.978 | 3.978 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #14 | 4.022 | 4.022 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #4 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #5 | 4.350 | 4.350 |
| Overall | #6 | 4.180 | 4.180 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #7 | 4.025 | 4.025 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #8 | 4.025 | 4.025 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #10 | 4.225 | 4.225 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #6 | 4.316 | 4.316 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #11 | 4.211 | 4.211 |
| Overall | #12 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #16 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #27 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #28 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #7 | 4.265 | 4.265 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #8 | 4.163 | 4.163 |
| Overall | #9 | 4.082 | 4.082 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #12 | 4.204 | 4.204 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #15 | 3.939 | 3.939 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #20 | 3.837 | 3.837 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #8 | 4.225 | 4.225 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #13 | 3.900 | 3.900 |
| Overall | #16 | 3.955 | 3.955 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #16 | 3.925 | 3.925 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #25 | 3.975 | 3.975 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #36 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #5 | 4.171 | 4.171 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #6 | 4.343 | 4.343 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #6 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #8 | 4.126 | 4.126 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #9 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #26 | 3.714 | 3.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #1 | 4.426 | 4.426 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #3 | 4.298 | 4.298 |
| Overall | #5 | 4.191 | 4.191 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #6 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #8 | 4.021 | 4.021 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #10 | 4.170 | 4.170 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #12 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Overall | #34 | 3.754 | 3.754 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #37 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #48 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #55 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #4 | 4.115 | 4.115 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
| Overall | #15 | 3.977 | 3.977 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #20 | 4.038 | 4.038 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #32 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #2 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Overall | #3 | 4.244 | 4.244 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #5 | 4.361 | 4.361 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #7 | 4.028 | 4.028 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #13 | 4.139 | 4.139 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #14 | 4.133 | 4.133 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #18 | 3.867 | 3.867 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #24 | 3.867 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #26 | 3.967 | 3.967 |
| Overall | #27 | 3.813 | 3.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #61 | 3.233 | 3.233 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #15 | 4.133 | 4.400 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #15 | 3.883 | 4.133 |
| Overall | #21 | 3.920 | 4.173 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #21 | 4.008 | 4.267 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #24 | 3.757 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #29 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #9 | 4.109 | 4.109 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #16 | 4.125 | 4.125 |
| Overall | #20 | 3.922 | 3.922 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #21 | 3.797 | 3.797 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #24 | 3.813 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #38 | 3.766 | 3.766 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #16 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #17 | 4.120 | 4.120 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #18 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Overall | #23 | 3.864 | 3.864 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #39 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #44 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #10 | 3.952 | 3.952 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #16 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Overall | #17 | 3.952 | 3.952 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #18 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #20 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #35 | 3.762 | 3.762 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #17 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #32 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #52 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #55 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #13 | 4.176 | 4.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #14 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #19 | 3.929 | 3.929 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #22 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
