211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #119 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #124 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #129 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
Overall | #139 | 2.612 | 2.612 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #158 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #161 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #135 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #146 | 2.750 | 4.286 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #146 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
Overall | #148 | 2.457 | 3.829 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #156 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #162 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #158 | 2.017 | 3.143 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #162 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
Overall | #172 | 2.182 | 3.400 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #182 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #101 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #111 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #114 | 2.630 | 2.800 |
Overall | #129 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #143 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #164 | 2.380 | 2.533 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #136 | 2.454 | 3.200 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #154 | 2.071 | 2.700 |
Overall | #160 | 2.332 | 3.040 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #165 | 2.378 | 3.100 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #166 | 2.301 | 3.000 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #168 | 2.454 | 3.200 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #143 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #166 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
Overall | #176 | 2.104 | 2.240 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #180 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #183 | 1.566 | 1.667 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #186 | 1.691 | 1.800 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #157 | 2.058 | 3.000 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #167 | 2.315 | 3.375 |
Overall | #174 | 2.127 | 3.100 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #175 | 2.315 | 3.375 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #179 | 2.144 | 3.125 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #179 | 1.801 | 2.625 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #143 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #168 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
Overall | #177 | 2.094 | 2.094 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #180 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #182 | 1.647 | 1.647 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #190 | 1.647 | 1.647 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #125 | 2.658 | 4.143 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #133 | 2.842 | 4.429 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
Overall | #155 | 2.420 | 3.771 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #183 | 2.017 | 3.143 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #186 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
Overall | #188 | 1.815 | 2.829 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #189 | 1.375 | 2.143 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #194 | 1.467 | 2.286 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #170 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #176 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
Overall | #180 | 1.998 | 3.114 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #194 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #139 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #139 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #141 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
Overall | #144 | 2.482 | 2.482 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #146 | 2.176 | 2.176 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #152 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #160 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
Overall | #168 | 2.224 | 2.224 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #170 | 1.941 | 1.941 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #152 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #160 | 2.353 | 2.353 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
Overall | #178 | 2.094 | 2.094 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #181 | 1.765 | 1.765 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #185 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #170 | 1.801 | 2.625 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #175 | 2.229 | 3.250 |
Overall | #183 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #184 | 2.144 | 3.125 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #185 | 1.715 | 2.500 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #187 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #167 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #172 | 1.925 | 3.000 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Overall | #179 | 2.053 | 3.200 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #181 | 2.108 | 3.286 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #181 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #141 | 2.750 | 4.286 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #157 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Overall | #164 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #141 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #145 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
Overall | #161 | 2.328 | 3.629 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #170 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #164 | 2.304 | 2.375 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #165 | 2.486 | 2.563 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #172 | 1.758 | 1.813 |
Overall | #175 | 2.110 | 2.175 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #178 | 1.819 | 1.875 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #179 | 2.183 | 2.250 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #180 | 2.178 | 3.667 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #190 | 1.881 | 3.167 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #191 | 1.584 | 2.667 |
Overall | #191 | 1.683 | 2.833 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #199 | 1.584 | 2.667 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #200 | 1.188 | 2.000 |