210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #127 | 2.910 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #142 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #147 | 2.547 | 2.625 |
| Overall | #153 | 2.425 | 2.500 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #163 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #172 | 1.758 | 1.813 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #143 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #168 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Overall | #177 | 2.094 | 2.094 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #180 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #182 | 1.647 | 1.647 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #190 | 1.647 | 1.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #135 | 2.818 | 3.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #144 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #144 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #147 | 2.467 | 2.627 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #149 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #163 | 1.941 | 2.067 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #132 | 2.743 | 2.920 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #135 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #143 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #144 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #135 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #146 | 2.750 | 4.286 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #146 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Overall | #148 | 2.457 | 3.829 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #156 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #162 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #117 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #134 | 2.830 | 4.125 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #138 | 2.658 | 3.875 |
| Overall | #140 | 2.590 | 3.775 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #147 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #160 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #134 | 2.486 | 2.563 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #136 | 2.668 | 2.750 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #148 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Overall | #151 | 2.437 | 2.513 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #156 | 2.062 | 2.125 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #175 | 2.243 | 2.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #75 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Overall | #141 | 2.530 | 2.530 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #149 | 2.700 | 2.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #161 | 1.950 | 1.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #189 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #131 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #142 | 2.517 | 2.680 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #149 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #150 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #178 | 2.192 | 2.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #148 | 2.148 | 2.800 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #149 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #151 | 2.684 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #154 | 2.424 | 3.160 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #155 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #155 | 2.224 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #77 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #123 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Overall | #138 | 2.640 | 2.640 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #152 | 2.650 | 2.650 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #158 | 2.450 | 2.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #160 | 2.150 | 2.150 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #140 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #143 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Overall | #149 | 2.455 | 2.613 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #149 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #153 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #159 | 2.442 | 2.600 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #144 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #149 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #153 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #158 | 2.342 | 2.493 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #159 | 2.192 | 2.333 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #172 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #125 | 2.658 | 4.143 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #133 | 2.842 | 4.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #155 | 2.420 | 3.771 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #169 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #158 | 2.017 | 3.143 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #162 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Overall | #172 | 2.182 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #182 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #141 | 2.750 | 4.286 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #157 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Overall | #164 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #175 | 1.742 | 2.714 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #141 | 2.383 | 3.714 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #145 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #161 | 2.328 | 3.629 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #170 | 2.292 | 3.571 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #176 | 2.200 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #135 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #155 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #155 | 2.567 | 4.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #156 | 2.475 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #157 | 2.365 | 3.686 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #167 | 1.833 | 2.857 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #112 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #151 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Overall | #156 | 2.388 | 2.388 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #160 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #171 | 1.765 | 1.765 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #152 | 2.118 | 2.118 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #160 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #167 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| Overall | #168 | 2.224 | 2.224 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #170 | 1.941 | 1.941 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #172 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
