211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #81 | 3.262 | 3.362 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #103 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #115 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #57 | 3.241 | 3.571 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #59 | 3.565 | 3.929 |
| Overall | #82 | 3.254 | 3.586 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #88 | 3.111 | 3.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #92 | 3.500 | 3.857 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #130 | 2.852 | 3.143 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #60 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #83 | 3.250 | 3.350 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #85 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #91 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #53 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #72 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #84 | 3.249 | 3.867 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #123 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #69 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #85 | 3.247 | 3.247 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #96 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #113 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #59 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #75 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #86 | 3.231 | 3.440 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #100 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #109 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #51 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #56 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #87 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Overall | #87 | 3.221 | 3.221 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #109 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #137 | 2.789 | 2.789 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #72 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #78 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Overall | #88 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #117 | 2.611 | 2.611 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #46 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #89 | 3.210 | 3.210 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #96 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #111 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #119 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #65 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #82 | 3.571 | 4.250 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #85 | 3.361 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #90 | 3.207 | 3.817 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #144 | 2.240 | 2.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #74 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #88 | 3.335 | 3.438 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #89 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Overall | #91 | 3.201 | 3.300 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #116 | 2.971 | 3.063 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #81 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Overall | #92 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #94 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #54 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #89 | 3.222 | 3.222 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #92 | 2.778 | 2.778 |
| Overall | #93 | 3.189 | 3.189 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #97 | 2.944 | 2.944 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #99 | 3.222 | 3.222 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #76 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #86 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #91 | 3.059 | 3.059 |
| Overall | #94 | 3.188 | 3.188 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #96 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #103 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #71 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #87 | 3.118 | 3.118 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #93 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #95 | 3.153 | 3.153 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #124 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #63 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #85 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #89 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #96 | 3.129 | 3.225 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #102 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #145 | 2.668 | 2.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #70 | 3.291 | 3.917 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #90 | 3.221 | 3.833 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #91 | 3.501 | 4.167 |
| Overall | #97 | 3.109 | 3.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #129 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #74 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #80 | 3.321 | 3.321 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #98 | 3.107 | 3.107 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #121 | 2.964 | 2.964 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #127 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Overall | #99 | 3.094 | 3.094 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #105 | 2.882 | 2.882 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #116 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #133 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #86 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| Overall | #100 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #103 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #105 | 3.335 | 3.438 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
