211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #52 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #56 | 3.579 | 3.579 |
| Overall | #61 | 3.432 | 3.432 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #73 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #101 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #31 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #52 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Overall | #62 | 3.421 | 3.421 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #64 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #75 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #104 | 2.895 | 2.895 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #50 | 3.810 | 3.810 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #50 | 3.476 | 3.476 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #61 | 3.524 | 3.524 |
| Overall | #63 | 3.410 | 3.410 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #84 | 2.905 | 2.905 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #45 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #54 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #64 | 3.408 | 3.513 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #73 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #40 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Overall | #65 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #87 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #110 | 3.050 | 3.050 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #30 | 3.820 | 3.938 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #66 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #76 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #89 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #107 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #59 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Overall | #67 | 3.388 | 3.388 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #101 | 2.941 | 2.941 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #60 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #65 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #67 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Overall | #68 | 3.379 | 3.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #57 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Overall | #69 | 3.369 | 3.587 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #71 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #96 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #51 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #55 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Overall | #70 | 3.367 | 3.367 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #74 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #76 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #102 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #34 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #46 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #62 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #71 | 3.359 | 3.462 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #115 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #70 | 3.650 | 3.650 |
| Overall | #72 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #90 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #103 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #42 | 3.732 | 3.732 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #60 | 3.707 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #65 | 3.341 | 3.341 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #71 | 3.390 | 3.390 |
| Overall | #73 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #122 | 2.561 | 2.561 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #47 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #68 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #74 | 3.344 | 3.560 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #83 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #111 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #66 | 3.426 | 3.426 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #68 | 3.660 | 3.660 |
| Overall | #75 | 3.332 | 3.332 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #78 | 2.979 | 2.979 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #79 | 3.234 | 3.234 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #84 | 3.362 | 3.362 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #66 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #67 | 3.423 | 3.423 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #72 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #72 | 3.462 | 3.462 |
| Overall | #76 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #112 | 2.654 | 2.654 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #39 | 3.762 | 3.762 |
| Overall | #77 | 3.286 | 3.286 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #77 | 3.238 | 3.238 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #88 | 3.238 | 3.238 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #96 | 2.762 | 2.762 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #98 | 3.429 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #49 | 3.690 | 3.690 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #63 | 3.483 | 3.483 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #76 | 3.241 | 3.241 |
| Overall | #78 | 3.283 | 3.283 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #88 | 3.517 | 3.517 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #128 | 2.483 | 2.483 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #64 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #78 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Overall | #79 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #82 | 2.923 | 2.923 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #136 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #70 | 3.105 | 3.105 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #78 | 3.579 | 3.579 |
| Overall | #80 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #83 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #92 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #92 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
