"Well then firstly tell me what that system is." I joined this jam to think, explore ideas, and communicate on that subject. I personally don't know "what that system is", but i believe such a system exists.

"Next realize that this same exact thing has been tried and tried and only leads to communism"
I don't know if you know, but Communism is a political system, while capitalism is an economic system. Both can happen at once, and destroying capitalism doesn't mean destroying our politic system (Sure, it'll changes a lot of things). I don't have any links to send to you right now, but I may do some research if you're interested.

"when dismantling a system it universally always creates a  power vacuum in which a dictator takes place"
Sadly this happens often, yes. But it doesn't mean that's an universal rules.

"How entitled do you have to be to think that capitalism is this big evil while your living in all its riches."
uhh, Climate Change? Ecosystem destruction? I may see a world without bees because toxic pesticide are overused and big companies use their money to influence laws. In France, neonicotinoids should have been forbidden since 2018, but the big sugar producers managed to get a special derogation until 2020, then until 2023.
Maybe you think the world should work like that, and riches company should have their word to say in the laws, i don't. A world were the riches can change the law to get richer is far from a true democracy.

"You can spend time arguing with a random dude online on technology which would be unthinkable even a hundred years ago"

yeah, technology, not capitalism. It seems to me you confuse lots of concepts with capitalism.
We live in a capitalist world since a lot of time,  so much time that lots of people can't even consider/imagine the world without it.
That's the point of this jam. Thinking, Imagining, sharing. Exploring possibilities deemed impossible by some people.

ah yes, communism is when dictator

you're on a completely different page than everyone else

A government can act in the interest of a capitalist system, without capitalism being a governmental structure. Example: Governments can work in the interest of some guy named Jim, but that doesn't make Jim a system of government.

I can blame the government for how it actively supports our capitalist system, without thinking that any action taken by the government is capitalism.

I find it hard to believe that you are actually this dumb and figure you are just a malicious and or narcissistic asshole. Enjoy licking that boot.

Would you rather be a game developer or be a male prostitute? Let's say male prostitutes make a higher salary than game developers. If it makes more money to jerk off some punks under a bridge than it does to make a computer game then why not be a male prostitute? It would be irrational not to jerk off punks under a bridge since the financial incentive would be greater. I'm not disparaging male prostitution as a profession - people have to make a buck. I just want to illustrate that there are other factors besides financial incentive which motivate us.

The “Holodomor” is Holocaust denial. You are doing Holocaust denial. You are downplaying/justifying the actions of literal nazis. You have been doing Holocaust denial this entire conversation. You don’t give af about the Jewish people or any actual victims of actual genocide. You literally only care to think about or mention them as some cheap, baseless “gotcha.” Or worse, as a footnote to your fun little “trolling.” You are reducing actual human beings and cultures to a political tool at best, and disposable ammunition for your own, petty amusement at worst.

You are the Holocaust denier here you dense little philistine. Trolling or not, what you’re doing is despicable, and in a just society you would unironically face retribution. 

The Holodomor or famine of 1932-1933 was not genocide. It was a famine caused by severe crop failure and drought.  The main casualties during this period were from epidemics, which were exacerbated by the famine. But it was not a policy of extermination. The Soviet government fought the famine, it bought food and sent it to the affected areas. All possible forces were thrown into the fight against the epidemic, and the fight against speculators and people who stole food was intensified. These measures made it possible to stop the epidemic and save many lives. Later collectivization and agricultural development finally solved the problem of famine in the USSR. There is no reason to consider the famine of 1932-1933 a genocide.

The Gulag was a correctional camp, not an extermination camp. Yes, the USSR had the death penalty. The death penalty is still practiced in some countries. But it was not genocide. It were executions of court-ordered punishments for crimes.

Before the Great Leap, China was a backward agrarian country. The goal of the Great Leap was industrialization and economic upswing. Oil fields were built, terraced farming and irrigation facilities become widespread. During the Great Leap, experience and skills were gained, which came in handy in the further development of the country. Villages where poor people lived established weaving workshops and forges during the Great Leap, which have now grown into textile factories and plants. Certainly many mistakes were made. These mistakes were compounded by incompetent cadres, traitors and counter-revolutionaries, and the breakdown of friendly relations with the USSR, where counter-revolutionaries came to power. But the mistakes were corrected, the traitors were punished, and the positive results were developed and multiplied. The people who died from mistakes during the Great Leap is a great tragedy for the Chinese people and the whole world, but there is no reason to call this policy genocide either.

Pogroms during the Cultural Revolution are a negative thing, but the Cultural Revolution played a huge positive role in identifying enemies of the working class and neutralizing them as a political force for a while. But it was not genocide either.

So, none of your examples is an act of genocide. And it can in no way be equated with a policy of racially targeted extermination of people by the nationalists of the 3rd Reich.