211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #32 | 3.629 | 3.629 |
| Overall | #39 | 3.669 | 3.669 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #41 | 3.743 | 3.743 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #46 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #69 | 3.657 | 3.657 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #42 | 3.732 | 3.732 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #60 | 3.707 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #65 | 3.341 | 3.341 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #71 | 3.390 | 3.390 |
| Overall | #73 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #122 | 2.561 | 2.561 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #19 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #28 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #28 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #33 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #43 | 3.722 | 3.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #16 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #17 | 4.120 | 4.120 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #18 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Overall | #23 | 3.864 | 3.864 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #39 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #44 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #34 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Overall | #44 | 3.617 | 3.617 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #45 | 3.708 | 3.708 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #50 | 3.625 | 3.625 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #51 | 3.792 | 3.792 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #54 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #34 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #46 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #62 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #71 | 3.359 | 3.462 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #115 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #47 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #68 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #74 | 3.344 | 3.560 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #83 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #111 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #12 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Overall | #34 | 3.754 | 3.754 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #37 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #48 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #55 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #49 | 3.690 | 3.690 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #63 | 3.483 | 3.483 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #76 | 3.241 | 3.241 |
| Overall | #78 | 3.283 | 3.283 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #88 | 3.517 | 3.517 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #128 | 2.483 | 2.483 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #5 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #21 | 4.048 | 4.048 |
| Overall | #22 | 3.886 | 3.886 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #23 | 3.881 | 3.881 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #31 | 3.738 | 3.738 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #50 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
| Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
| Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #53 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #72 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #84 | 3.249 | 3.867 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #123 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #45 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #54 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #64 | 3.408 | 3.513 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #73 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #55 | 3.633 | 3.633 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #121 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #132 | 2.433 | 2.433 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #140 | 2.833 | 2.833 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #18 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #25 | 3.808 | 3.808 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #41 | 3.638 | 3.638 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #56 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #88 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #70 | 3.650 | 3.650 |
| Overall | #72 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #90 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #103 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #46 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #89 | 3.210 | 3.210 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #96 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #111 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #119 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #59 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Overall | #67 | 3.388 | 3.388 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #101 | 2.941 | 2.941 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #60 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #83 | 3.250 | 3.350 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #85 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #91 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
