211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #33 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #47 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #49 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #61 | 3.556 | 3.556 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #71 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #85 | 3.556 | 3.556 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #53 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Overall | #54 | 3.480 | 3.480 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #58 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #60 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #62 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #74 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #69 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #85 | 3.247 | 3.247 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #96 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #113 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #48 | 3.324 | 3.324 |
| Overall | #55 | 3.465 | 3.465 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #56 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #62 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #76 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #60 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #65 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #67 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Overall | #68 | 3.379 | 3.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #25 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #38 | 3.919 | 3.919 |
| Overall | #47 | 3.557 | 3.557 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #63 | 3.351 | 3.351 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #66 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #87 | 3.243 | 3.243 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #43 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #49 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Overall | #53 | 3.482 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #56 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #41 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #60 | 3.432 | 3.653 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #64 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #65 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #41 | 3.409 | 3.409 |
| Overall | #52 | 3.482 | 3.482 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #54 | 3.591 | 3.591 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #61 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #86 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
| Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #19 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #31 | 3.632 | 3.632 |
| Overall | #35 | 3.726 | 3.726 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #45 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #71 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #66 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #67 | 3.423 | 3.423 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #72 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #72 | 3.462 | 3.462 |
| Overall | #76 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #112 | 2.654 | 2.654 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #42 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #58 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #63 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #73 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #94 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #51 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #55 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Overall | #70 | 3.367 | 3.367 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #74 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #76 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #102 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #75 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Overall | #141 | 2.530 | 2.530 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #149 | 2.700 | 2.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #161 | 1.950 | 1.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #189 | 2.000 | 2.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #30 | 3.820 | 3.938 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #66 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #76 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #89 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #107 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #38 | 3.607 | 3.607 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #39 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #45 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #56 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #77 | 3.393 | 3.393 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #72 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #78 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Overall | #88 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #117 | 2.611 | 2.611 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #59 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #75 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #86 | 3.231 | 3.440 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #100 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #109 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #71 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Overall | #120 | 2.906 | 3.093 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #138 | 2.881 | 3.067 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #162 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
