211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #55 | 3.633 | 3.633 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #121 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #132 | 2.433 | 2.433 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #140 | 2.833 | 2.833 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #101 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #106 | 2.881 | 3.067 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #118 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #122 | 2.893 | 3.080 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #143 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #107 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #110 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #116 | 2.971 | 3.063 |
| Overall | #123 | 2.838 | 2.925 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #163 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #102 | 2.914 | 3.800 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #107 | 2.684 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #113 | 3.221 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #124 | 2.792 | 3.640 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #149 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #151 | 2.608 | 3.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #102 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Overall | #125 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #136 | 2.910 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #137 | 2.425 | 2.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #138 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #122 | 3.136 | 3.136 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #123 | 2.682 | 2.682 |
| Overall | #126 | 2.773 | 2.773 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #128 | 2.909 | 2.909 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #128 | 2.773 | 2.773 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #136 | 2.364 | 2.364 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #94 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #112 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
| Overall | #127 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #135 | 2.941 | 2.941 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #140 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #147 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #106 | 2.692 | 2.692 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #121 | 2.692 | 2.692 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #128 | 3.026 | 3.026 |
| Overall | #128 | 2.759 | 2.759 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #131 | 2.744 | 2.744 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #149 | 2.641 | 2.641 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #115 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #127 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Overall | #129 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #149 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #154 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #101 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #111 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #114 | 2.630 | 2.800 |
| Overall | #129 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #143 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #164 | 2.380 | 2.533 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #68 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #126 | 2.650 | 2.650 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #131 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Overall | #131 | 2.750 | 2.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #174 | 1.750 | 1.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #132 | 2.743 | 2.920 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #135 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #143 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #144 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #123 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #124 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #125 | 2.818 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #131 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #132 | 2.743 | 2.920 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #138 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #108 | 3.059 | 3.059 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #116 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #134 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #139 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #166 | 1.882 | 1.882 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #106 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #129 | 2.471 | 2.471 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #129 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Overall | #135 | 2.694 | 2.694 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #145 | 2.294 | 2.294 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #147 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #125 | 3.111 | 3.429 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #126 | 2.917 | 3.214 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #134 | 2.398 | 2.643 |
| Overall | #136 | 2.671 | 2.943 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #139 | 2.658 | 2.929 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #148 | 2.269 | 2.500 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #101 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #130 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #131 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #137 | 2.643 | 2.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #138 | 2.317 | 2.467 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #172 | 2.254 | 2.400 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #77 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #123 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Overall | #138 | 2.640 | 2.640 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #152 | 2.650 | 2.650 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #158 | 2.450 | 2.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #160 | 2.150 | 2.150 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #119 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #124 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #129 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #139 | 2.612 | 2.612 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #158 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #161 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #117 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #134 | 2.830 | 4.125 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #138 | 2.658 | 3.875 |
| Overall | #140 | 2.590 | 3.775 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #147 | 2.744 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #160 | 1.972 | 2.875 |
