itch.io

Cool game! Played up to the platinum level. The basic mechanic is easy to understand and the UI is intuitive. What I not really get is how the PvP should work.

I encountered two bugs:

• In the screen where the minions can be selected one "card" was stuck on the mouse ... nothing worked anymore ... I had to kill the game.
• A few times there were rounds without any enemies. This happened only in rounds 9 & 10.

I see a lot of potential here. Well done.

Things you could improve:

Inventory management - would be nice to see the stats of the currently equipped item, also an side by side view of character and inventory with drag&drop could be an improvement

A "loot" screen - when the dungeon is completed it would be nice to have a screen where the gained items can be seen. The loot going directly into the inventory feels a bit anticlimactic. I think this could be the most interesting moment in the game: what do I get from the run?!

More content - I quickly had 4 heroes with 3 traits and a lot of money with nothing left to spend it on...

This game is very polished, the mechanic is cool and everything works perfectly. I would not call it "pre-alpha" :)

It is not my genre (I never played another metriodvania - had to look it up on wikipedia) so it is hard for me to give you any advice. There are no obvious shortcomings ...

What I liked most where the boss fights - figuring out the mechanic and then applying the "win"-strategy was engaging.

That was exacly what I was looking for! But opening the documentation via the menu does not work for me...

Many thanks for the feedback!

You are not the first complaining about the sound. It works quite fine in the installed version on my desktop with headphones. But on other setups the levels seem to be wrong. Some have only very silent voiceover, others have no ambient sounds (like you). I will try to fix that for the next update.

I will also improve the selection visual.

When it comes to defensive structures/units I am a bit unsure. Currently 4 additional units are planned. When those are finished I will do the multiplayer balancing ... and maybe come back to this idea.

I played YesterSol about a year ago. Will have a look again... :)

It is fun! Graphics are nice and the controls work well.

I found two bugs:

1. Once the screen was not cleaned up: ghosts where hanging in mid-air

2. I got a crash in ghost.lua:56: Attemp to use destroyed body.

Very nice. Interesting concept. Not to hard - not to easy. And I like the graphics too. Well done!

The only thing I would complain about is the performance. When switching screens it was a bit laggy for me. But I only tried the web-version - probably the downloaded version runs smoother...

I like it. A really nice game ... but difficult. I died a lot :) But I guess that is how it is meant to be.

Some small things you might improve:

• At some places there are spikes behind walls that are hard to see. That feels a bit unfair...
• The game cannot be installed via the itch-app. Maybe take a look at butler and use it for publishing the game

The good news: I got the train driving in circles!

I actually learned the assembly language when I was in school ... but still I did not find it easy to understand how to control the train.

The documentation (Editor->Documentation) does not work for me. It would be very helpful to have a full documentation how to control the train. What do the registers TD1-TD8 exactly do?

It would also be nice if the program editing and running would be a bit smoother. Maybe merge the program and editor window so that the program can directly be executed in the editor window?

An interesting project and the core mechanic works well, but I think for beginners the learning curve may be a bit steep ... and the controls a bit to old school ...

Send the new "Hover Glider" into battle! The first flying unit on Epsilon Indi. Call a friend and use the new "custom game" to play PvP! Create an account or just play as "Anonymous" over the internet.

Check it out here: Epsilon Indi

Have fun!!!!!

There is the new "AI generation disclosure" option, but what is exactly covered by this? For some cases this is clear to me (AI generated images & text), but what is with cases like:

• machine translations (nowadays they are based on LLMs)
• text to speech (based on AI)
• AI opponents based on neural networks
• spell/grammar checking by LLMs for in game texts
• use of copilot coding assistents based on LLMs (Github copilot etc.)

Is there an extensive list what needs to be tagged as "generative AI used"?

I revisited this and now played all available levels. Here some additional findings:

What I like

• The graphics style
• The user interface is intuitive and easy to learn
• Game pacing is well done, I play all the time as 1x and it is flowing well

Things that could be improved

• Add more variation to the levels:
  • There is no much difference if you have to send 4 or 10 bunnies to space
  • The rocket is rather cheap, I was able to build and launch it always on the 2nd day
  • Maybe add upgrades to the rocket: Level 1 has only 4 seats, upgrade for additional seats
• I had no need for the different tower types, maybe add more versatile enemies that require certain towers to counter

Issues I encountered

• Once I was stuck in the night, speed was at 4x and nothing happened. I had to leave and load again to make it continue
• When choosing the tower type it is not checked that there is enough wood, I got negative wood once
• Upgrades sometimes seem to be stuck, then suddenly they have very fast progression

I tried out the recent version. I like the improvements. The 16x speed is cool, but maybe always reset it to 1x at the begin of the battle. I tried again the "basic rocket launcher", it still does not work. When I click it, it is not attached to the mouse so I cannot mount it on a hardpoint.

Many thanks, great feedback!

I will work on the improvements you suggested for the next update.

Regarding the resource cap: Actually there is a "soft"-cap. When you have more harvesters gathering at the same place the efficiency drops. When you closely look at the stats at the end of your game you can see, that at 11 minutes you have only half of the harvesters of the AI but 90% of the income. What you did was much more efficient than what the AI did. The resources are also limited, it is just not visible in the game. I have to improve that.

Wow, many thanks! That is very helpful. Really cool to see someone play the game for the first time. Gave me a lot of ideas for improvements.

Hi, I played your game and I see some potential here!

But I also found some things that I think could be improved:

• Add some ambient noise. When I clicked the first thing that made a sound It caught my by surprise - very unnatural if there is not at least some sound floor.
• The battles are a bit lengthy, and it felt not so important to watch them. It is not possible to affect the outcome, and I had to "farm" materials for a lot of matches to improve my ship, so it was not really necessary to watch them for learning either. Maybe add some interactivity, allow more the 4x speed or make resource farming faster so that there is more building than fighting
• I could not figure out how to place the rocket launcher, I tried everything but was not able to mount it to my ship

I hope this helps a bit. Keep up the good work!

I restarted the tutorial a few times, but I was not able to reproduce the problem. Seems not to be a serious issue.

Another thing is: I do not really understand why I need a fire? The tutorial tells it helps to see enemies, but the night is not very dark. My impression was, that defenses also work without fires. Maybe make the night darker? Make it more "spooky" when there are no fires?

If you have time you could take a look at https://crashdumpsoftware.itch.io/crits it is a feedback trade extension for itch.io. It was probably a dumb idea by me, but would be nice if you could take a look, maybe import one of your projects, an give your opinion.

If that is not your cup of tea: The game I am currently working on is https://crashdumpsoftware.itch.io/epsilon-indi . I had no feedback since the last update ... so feedback would be useful as well.

Honestly I do not really understand which "gap" your site fills, that is not already covered by itch.io? Maybe you could explain it in a bit more detail ...

Hi,

i played the first 5 levels of your game. This is what I found:

• I had a bug in the tutorial where the next step was not triggered at some point. When it continued are had already built almost everything. But it was not really a problem as I found the controls intuitive, I had no problem to figure everything out even without explanations.
• Regarding the "pacing": I never had any downtime at all. I always went for a very economic build: get a lot of carrots & workers first. Then build defenses as late as possible. That worked out well without any downtime.
• Difficulty: I found it too easy. I mostly managed to launch the rocket on day 2. So I had only to defend 1 night. And those fights were never even close. I never built any walls, never upgraded the fire. I just built 3 sniper towers and upgrade them. That was more than enough.
• UX/Controls: Very good, everything is intuitiv and easy to understand
• What you could improve: allow to adjust the difficulty, maybe a global setting to hard/very hard mode: more enemies, more waves, more versatile enemies that need different treatment (like swarms of small enemies that need splash towers).
• Graphics: I like it, bunnies are cute :)

I hope that helps a bit.

I created a prototype for an alternative ranking of projects. Not by "popularity" but by "need for feedback". If you need feedback and you are willing to give feedback in exchange, you can try it out here: www.crits.top

There is also a itch.io page explaining the details: https://crashdumpsoftware.itch.io/crits

I think such a ranking could be useful on itch.io for projects that are in development and need some feedback, but are not mature enough to climb up the usual ranking by popularity.

That is how the ranking looks right now:

(sadly there are only two of my own projects in the list right now, but if someone is willing to add his project, I will update the screenshot :) )

Dear developers,

I am developing games as a hobby and I do not have a relevant amount of followers. That is totally fine most of the times, but sometimes I would like to get some feedback. In the past I waited for an appropriate game jam to trade feedback. That worked great, but is not always available. An alternative is this forum, but that does not work as well in my experience. (For instance: I wrote the first version of this post ~24 h ago, and no one even tried it out ...)

Then I had this idea: What if there was a ranking of games on itch.io that ranked not by "popularity" but by "is in need for feedback the most".  To test it out I created a prototype that ranks projects like this: Those developers that gave more feedback than they received are ranked to the top. With that ranking it should be possible to trade feedback in a large pool, but not only "one on one".

What do you think of that Idea?

If you need feedback yourself and are willing to give feedback to others in return it would be great if you would add your project to the ranking. (As an extra bonus: I will do extensive reviews on the first 5 games that are put on the list.)

You can take a look at the prototype here: crits

There is also an itch page: https://crashdumpsoftware.itch.io/crits

It would also be great if you could give feedback on the prototype itself: How is the usability? Did you find the button to rank your project up? Is the mechanic clear? What feature is missing? What do you think about the surveys? What about the ratings?

You have to add a collider and a rigidbody to your gameobject. Disable "UseGravity" and "IsKinematic". Under constraints set all rotations to freeze.

Attach a script that simulates the physics you want. For example:

public class Bounce : MonoBehaviour
{
    private Vector3 _initialPosition;
    private Rigidbody _rigidbody;
    void Start()
    {
        _initialPosition = gameObject.transform.position;
        _rigidbody = GetComponent<Rigidbody>();
    }
    void Update()
    {
        var force = 50 * (_initialPosition - gameObject.transform.position);
        var damping = -5 * _rigidbody.velocity;
        _rigidbody.AddForce(force + damping, ForceMode.Force);
    }
}

It is possible to write reviews before the votings starts ... and then people forget to come back later to give there vote. Maybe that happended to you.

I joined a few jams now. It is always like that: Only a minority of the participants are doing reviews and votes.

From the developer point of view I find this interesting.

But from a players point of view it is not that interesting: As a player I do not care about the mathematics, I just run around, collect what I can and expect that everything is "solvable". I do not care how the develper achieved that it is always solvable.

I think you have an interesting alorithm you can build upon. But for the game to be really interesting to play I think you have to add a bit more. What you could try is to add several minigames to make the journey more interesting. Ideas are:

- Replace the signs by NPC that have to be persuaded to provide the information

- Make fights interesting

The tank looks nice and the controls for the camera are fine. What you could improve are the controls for placing plants and stones: Instead of the x,y,z arrows it would be nice if I could move plant with the mouse along the ground surface (adjust the height automatically). For the other props (wood & stone) it could be nice if they could just be dropped and are then placed via a physics simulation using colliders.

I had a bug once where one of the fish was trapped outside of the tank.

This game has a nice concept. I like it.

Tutorial: The tutorial is good. It does a good job to introduce the different mechanics while still offering some gameplay already.

Difficulty: It is way to high! The first level after the tutorial is totally overwhelming. I would suggest that you have a level system with a slow increase of difficulty. Especially I would put much less items, curses, etc. in the first levels.

Graphics: Simple, but nice.

Other: It is not so easy to keep track of the 3 resources (time, energy, and life). I might be helpful to visualize the effect of equipment, consumables & curses on these values. Maybe also show the current effect of a move on these resources, taking into account the effect of all equipments & curses. Or even a "moves left" counter that shows the available moves when nothing changes.

I just started it again and found out that you replaced the mercenaries with towers and drones ... not sure if they have the same issues I had with the mercenaries ...

Wow this is a great improvement over the last version I tested! You solved all the issues I had with the previous version, without sacrificing the basic concept (permadeath, etc.). The different options of retreat, along with the choice to sell ore early or not, creates meaningful decisions. Overall the mecanic feels very balanced now.

The only thing which felt a bit underpowered to me are the mercenaries. It never felt like a good idea to invest into them. Maybe there is a theoretical window where it makes sense to hire mercenaries to complete a mission that otherwhise would fail, but that is very hard to predict. Maybe you could make them cheaper so that there is always the question "How many mercenaries should I hire?". Or they come with increasing prices.

Overall the game is really fun!

Pretty cool game! I took me some tries to beat the 700, but I did it! (I played the v2 version)

The game is already fun, and feels complete.

Things you may consider:

• Furter improve the controls, sometimes it is hard to hit an exact spot
• The maze goes rather quickly from super easy (~800) to impossible (~1000). Maybe you could ease that out a bit. One idea could be to allow infite bombs, but make them more expensive every time (maybe -10, -20, -30, ...).
• You could change the algorithm so that at some point the maze gets more complicated, but does not block completety: Not only add walls but also remove others, so that the path to the exit becomes longer but still exists. (I am aware that this may be very difficult.)