211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #12 | 4.050 | 4.050 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #15 | 4.100 | 4.100 |
| Overall | #24 | 3.850 | 3.850 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #40 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Overall | #65 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #87 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #110 | 3.050 | 3.050 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #42 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #58 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #63 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #73 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #94 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #30 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
| Overall | #46 | 3.570 | 3.570 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #51 | 3.303 | 3.303 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #52 | 3.606 | 3.606 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #64 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #66 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #41 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #60 | 3.432 | 3.653 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #64 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #65 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #66 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #67 | 3.423 | 3.423 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #72 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #72 | 3.462 | 3.462 |
| Overall | #76 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #112 | 2.654 | 2.654 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #60 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #65 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #67 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Overall | #68 | 3.379 | 3.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #66 | 3.426 | 3.426 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #68 | 3.660 | 3.660 |
| Overall | #75 | 3.332 | 3.332 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #78 | 2.979 | 2.979 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #79 | 3.234 | 3.234 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #84 | 3.362 | 3.362 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #32 | 3.629 | 3.629 |
| Overall | #39 | 3.669 | 3.669 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #41 | 3.743 | 3.743 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #46 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #69 | 3.657 | 3.657 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #70 | 3.650 | 3.650 |
| Overall | #72 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #90 | 2.800 | 2.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #103 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #71 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #87 | 3.118 | 3.118 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #93 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #95 | 3.153 | 3.153 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #124 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #53 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #72 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #84 | 3.249 | 3.867 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #123 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #45 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #54 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #64 | 3.408 | 3.513 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #73 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #81 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Overall | #92 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #94 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #57 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Overall | #69 | 3.369 | 3.587 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #71 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #96 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #51 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #55 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Overall | #70 | 3.367 | 3.367 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #74 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #76 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #102 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #41 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #44 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Overall | #57 | 3.459 | 3.459 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #77 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #97 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #70 | 3.105 | 3.105 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #78 | 3.579 | 3.579 |
| Overall | #80 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #83 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #92 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #92 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #74 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #88 | 3.335 | 3.438 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #89 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Overall | #91 | 3.201 | 3.300 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #116 | 2.971 | 3.063 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #81 | 3.262 | 3.362 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #103 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #115 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
