210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #50 | 3.810 | 3.810 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #50 | 3.476 | 3.476 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #61 | 3.524 | 3.524 |
| Overall | #63 | 3.410 | 3.410 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #84 | 2.905 | 2.905 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #34 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #46 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #62 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #71 | 3.359 | 3.462 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #115 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #49 | 3.690 | 3.690 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #63 | 3.483 | 3.483 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #76 | 3.241 | 3.241 |
| Overall | #78 | 3.283 | 3.283 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #88 | 3.517 | 3.517 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #128 | 2.483 | 2.483 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #41 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #60 | 3.432 | 3.653 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #64 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #65 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #65 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #82 | 3.571 | 4.250 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #85 | 3.361 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #90 | 3.207 | 3.817 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #144 | 2.240 | 2.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #66 | 3.426 | 3.426 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #68 | 3.660 | 3.660 |
| Overall | #75 | 3.332 | 3.332 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #78 | 2.979 | 2.979 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #79 | 3.234 | 3.234 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #84 | 3.362 | 3.362 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #66 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #67 | 3.423 | 3.423 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #72 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #72 | 3.462 | 3.462 |
| Overall | #76 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #112 | 2.654 | 2.654 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #68 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #126 | 2.650 | 2.650 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #131 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Overall | #131 | 2.750 | 2.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #174 | 1.750 | 1.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #81 | 3.262 | 3.362 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #103 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #115 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #45 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #54 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #64 | 3.408 | 3.513 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #73 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #42 | 3.732 | 3.732 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #60 | 3.707 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #65 | 3.341 | 3.341 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #71 | 3.390 | 3.390 |
| Overall | #73 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #122 | 2.561 | 2.561 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #72 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #78 | 3.389 | 3.389 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Overall | #88 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #117 | 2.611 | 2.611 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
| Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #74 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #102 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Overall | #113 | 2.968 | 3.160 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #114 | 2.630 | 2.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #120 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #133 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #31 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #52 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Overall | #62 | 3.421 | 3.421 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #64 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #75 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #104 | 2.895 | 2.895 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #76 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #86 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #91 | 3.059 | 3.059 |
| Overall | #94 | 3.188 | 3.188 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #96 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #103 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #48 | 3.324 | 3.324 |
| Overall | #55 | 3.465 | 3.465 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #56 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #62 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #76 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #64 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #78 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
| Overall | #79 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #82 | 2.923 | 2.923 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #136 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #54 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #59 | 3.456 | 3.456 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #79 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #74 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #80 | 3.321 | 3.321 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #98 | 3.107 | 3.107 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #121 | 2.964 | 2.964 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #127 | 2.500 | 2.500 |
