210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
| Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #59 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Overall | #67 | 3.388 | 3.388 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #101 | 2.941 | 2.941 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #69 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #82 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #85 | 3.247 | 3.247 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #96 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #113 | 2.647 | 2.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #84 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #108 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Overall | #118 | 2.908 | 2.908 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #119 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #124 | 2.667 | 2.667 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #141 | 2.292 | 2.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #48 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #48 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #50 | 3.489 | 3.489 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #85 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #86 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| Overall | #100 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #103 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #105 | 3.335 | 3.438 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #25 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #38 | 3.919 | 3.919 |
| Overall | #47 | 3.557 | 3.557 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #63 | 3.351 | 3.351 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #66 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #87 | 3.243 | 3.243 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #39 | 3.762 | 3.762 |
| Overall | #77 | 3.286 | 3.286 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #77 | 3.238 | 3.238 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #88 | 3.238 | 3.238 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #96 | 2.762 | 2.762 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #98 | 3.429 | 3.429 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #54 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #89 | 3.222 | 3.222 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #92 | 2.778 | 2.778 |
| Overall | #93 | 3.189 | 3.189 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #97 | 2.944 | 2.944 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #99 | 3.222 | 3.222 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #70 | 3.291 | 3.917 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #90 | 3.221 | 3.833 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #91 | 3.501 | 4.167 |
| Overall | #97 | 3.109 | 3.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #129 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #60 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| Overall | #83 | 3.250 | 3.350 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #85 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #91 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #70 | 3.105 | 3.105 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #78 | 3.579 | 3.579 |
| Overall | #80 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #83 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #92 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #92 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #93 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #93 | 3.208 | 3.208 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #93 | 3.042 | 3.042 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #97 | 2.750 | 2.750 |
| Overall | #101 | 3.092 | 3.092 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #122 | 2.958 | 2.958 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #81 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Overall | #92 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #94 | 3.194 | 3.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #40 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #47 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Overall | #51 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #57 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #62 | 3.216 | 3.216 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #95 | 3.189 | 3.189 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Overall | #99 | 3.094 | 3.094 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #105 | 2.882 | 2.882 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #116 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #133 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #71 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #87 | 3.118 | 3.118 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #93 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Overall | #95 | 3.153 | 3.153 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #124 | 2.529 | 2.529 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #94 | 2.765 | 2.765 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #97 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Overall | #107 | 3.047 | 3.047 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #112 | 2.824 | 2.824 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #112 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #93 | 3.294 | 3.294 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #96 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #103 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Overall | #119 | 2.906 | 2.906 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #124 | 3.118 | 3.118 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #154 | 2.235 | 2.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #59 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #75 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #86 | 3.231 | 3.440 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #100 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #109 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
