210 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (100.0%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.2 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #41 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #44 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Overall | #57 | 3.459 | 3.459 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #77 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #97 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #42 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #58 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #63 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #73 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #94 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #43 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #49 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Overall | #53 | 3.482 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #56 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #2 | 4.406 | 4.406 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #30 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #33 | 3.763 | 3.763 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #44 | 3.688 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #46 | 3.844 | 3.844 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #69 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #19 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #31 | 3.632 | 3.632 |
| Overall | #35 | 3.726 | 3.726 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #45 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #71 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #46 | 3.681 | 4.800 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #113 | 3.068 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #114 | 2.945 | 3.840 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #122 | 2.684 | 3.500 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #130 | 2.454 | 3.200 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #139 | 2.838 | 3.700 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #27 | 3.703 | 3.703 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #35 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Overall | #37 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #47 | 3.838 | 3.838 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #47 | 3.649 | 3.649 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #49 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #28 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #33 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Overall | #38 | 3.671 | 3.671 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #66 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #13 | 4.176 | 4.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #14 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #19 | 3.929 | 3.929 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #22 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #34 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Overall | #44 | 3.617 | 3.617 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #45 | 3.708 | 3.708 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #50 | 3.625 | 3.625 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #51 | 3.792 | 3.792 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #54 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #51 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #55 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Overall | #70 | 3.367 | 3.367 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #74 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #76 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #102 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #30 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
| Overall | #46 | 3.570 | 3.570 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #51 | 3.303 | 3.303 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #52 | 3.606 | 3.606 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #64 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #66 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #53 | 3.605 | 4.700 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #83 | 2.914 | 3.800 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #100 | 3.221 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #106 | 3.053 | 3.980 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #130 | 2.531 | 3.300 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #130 | 2.991 | 3.900 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #41 | 3.409 | 3.409 |
| Overall | #52 | 3.482 | 3.482 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #54 | 3.591 | 3.591 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #61 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #86 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #17 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #32 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #52 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #55 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #52 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #56 | 3.579 | 3.579 |
| Overall | #61 | 3.432 | 3.432 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #73 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #101 | 3.211 | 3.211 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #57 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Overall | #69 | 3.369 | 3.587 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #71 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #74 | 3.632 | 3.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #96 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
| Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #57 | 3.241 | 3.571 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #59 | 3.565 | 3.929 |
| Overall | #82 | 3.254 | 3.586 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #88 | 3.111 | 3.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #92 | 3.500 | 3.857 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #130 | 2.852 | 3.143 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #53 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Overall | #54 | 3.480 | 3.480 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #58 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #60 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #62 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #74 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
