211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #41 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #60 | 3.432 | 3.653 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #64 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #65 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
| Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #39 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #43 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #43 | 3.560 | 3.560 |
| Overall | #48 | 3.520 | 3.520 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #131 | 2.440 | 2.440 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #41 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #44 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Overall | #57 | 3.459 | 3.459 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #77 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #97 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #45 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #54 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #64 | 3.408 | 3.513 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #69 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #73 | 3.638 | 3.750 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #85 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #32 | 3.629 | 3.629 |
| Overall | #39 | 3.669 | 3.669 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #41 | 3.743 | 3.743 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #46 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #69 | 3.657 | 3.657 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #40 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #47 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Overall | #51 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #57 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #62 | 3.216 | 3.216 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #95 | 3.189 | 3.189 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #48 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #48 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #50 | 3.489 | 3.489 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #85 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #27 | 3.703 | 3.703 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #35 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Overall | #37 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #47 | 3.838 | 3.838 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #47 | 3.649 | 3.649 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #49 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #50 | 3.810 | 3.810 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #50 | 3.476 | 3.476 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #61 | 3.524 | 3.524 |
| Overall | #63 | 3.410 | 3.410 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #84 | 2.905 | 2.905 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #51 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #56 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #87 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Overall | #87 | 3.221 | 3.221 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #109 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #137 | 2.789 | 2.789 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #17 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #32 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #52 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #55 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #12 | 4.050 | 4.050 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #15 | 4.100 | 4.100 |
| Overall | #24 | 3.850 | 3.850 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #40 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Overall | #65 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #87 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #110 | 3.050 | 3.050 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #51 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #55 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Overall | #70 | 3.367 | 3.367 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #74 | 3.444 | 3.444 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #76 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #102 | 2.722 | 2.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #43 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #49 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Overall | #53 | 3.482 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #56 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #53 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #72 | 3.641 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #84 | 3.249 | 3.867 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #108 | 2.661 | 3.167 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #123 | 2.871 | 3.417 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #57 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #65 | 3.431 | 4.083 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #82 | 3.571 | 4.250 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #85 | 3.361 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #90 | 3.207 | 3.817 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #144 | 2.240 | 2.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #59 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #75 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #86 | 3.231 | 3.440 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #100 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #109 | 3.256 | 3.467 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #60 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #65 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #67 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Overall | #68 | 3.379 | 3.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
