211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #4 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #9 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
| Overall | #10 | 4.045 | 4.045 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #21 | 3.825 | 3.825 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #35 | 3.925 | 3.925 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #13 | 4.176 | 4.176 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #14 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
| Overall | #19 | 3.929 | 3.929 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #22 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
| Overall | #11 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #14 | 4.148 | 4.148 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #23 | 3.815 | 3.815 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #23 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #25 | 3.852 | 3.852 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #9 | 4.109 | 4.109 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #16 | 4.125 | 4.125 |
| Overall | #20 | 3.922 | 3.922 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #21 | 3.797 | 3.797 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #24 | 3.813 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #38 | 3.766 | 3.766 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #18 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #25 | 3.808 | 3.808 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #41 | 3.638 | 3.638 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #56 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #88 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #17 | 3.967 | 3.967 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #26 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #29 | 3.787 | 3.787 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #67 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #6 | 4.316 | 4.316 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #11 | 4.211 | 4.211 |
| Overall | #12 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #16 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #27 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #28 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #19 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #28 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #28 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #33 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #43 | 3.722 | 3.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #23 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Overall | #26 | 3.823 | 3.823 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #29 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #32 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #37 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #2 | 4.406 | 4.406 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #30 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Overall | #33 | 3.763 | 3.763 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #44 | 3.688 | 3.688 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #46 | 3.844 | 3.844 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #69 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #5 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #21 | 4.048 | 4.048 |
| Overall | #22 | 3.886 | 3.886 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #23 | 3.881 | 3.881 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #31 | 3.738 | 3.738 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #50 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #4 | 4.115 | 4.115 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
| Overall | #15 | 3.977 | 3.977 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #20 | 4.038 | 4.038 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #32 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #28 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #33 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Overall | #38 | 3.671 | 3.671 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #66 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #34 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Overall | #44 | 3.617 | 3.617 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #45 | 3.708 | 3.708 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #50 | 3.625 | 3.625 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #51 | 3.792 | 3.792 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #54 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #13 | 4.045 | 4.045 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #35 | 3.636 | 3.636 |
| Overall | #36 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #36 | 3.773 | 3.773 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #44 | 3.864 | 3.864 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #65 | 3.182 | 3.182 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #26 | 3.849 | 3.849 |
| Overall | #31 | 3.777 | 3.777 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #36 | 3.623 | 3.623 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #52 | 3.302 | 3.302 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #20 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #27 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| Overall | #30 | 3.785 | 3.785 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #37 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #38 | 3.607 | 3.607 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #39 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #45 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #56 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #77 | 3.393 | 3.393 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
| Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
| Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
