211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #73 | 3.056 | 3.056 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #97 | 2.944 | 2.944 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #101 | 3.111 | 3.111 |
| Overall | #102 | 3.078 | 3.078 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #109 | 3.111 | 3.111 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #119 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #63 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #85 | 3.153 | 3.250 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #89 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #96 | 3.129 | 3.225 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #102 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #145 | 2.668 | 2.750 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #102 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Overall | #125 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #136 | 2.910 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #137 | 2.425 | 2.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #138 | 2.789 | 2.875 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #131 | 2.505 | 2.667 |
| Overall | #142 | 2.517 | 2.680 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #149 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #150 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #178 | 2.192 | 2.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #71 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #79 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Overall | #120 | 2.906 | 3.093 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #138 | 2.881 | 3.067 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #162 | 2.129 | 2.267 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #75 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #90 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Overall | #103 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #115 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #116 | 2.755 | 2.933 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #83 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #99 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #104 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Overall | #105 | 3.056 | 3.253 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #111 | 3.068 | 3.267 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #114 | 2.630 | 2.800 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #108 | 3.059 | 3.059 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #116 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #117 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #134 | 2.706 | 2.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #139 | 2.412 | 2.412 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #166 | 1.882 | 1.882 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #51 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #56 | 3.263 | 3.263 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #87 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Overall | #87 | 3.221 | 3.221 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #109 | 3.053 | 3.053 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #137 | 2.789 | 2.789 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #40 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Overall | #65 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #87 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #110 | 3.050 | 3.050 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #47 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #67 | 3.319 | 3.533 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #68 | 3.131 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #74 | 3.344 | 3.560 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #83 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #111 | 3.006 | 3.200 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #38 | 3.607 | 3.607 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #39 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #45 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #56 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #77 | 3.393 | 3.393 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #55 | 3.633 | 3.633 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Overall | #121 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #128 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #132 | 2.433 | 2.433 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #140 | 2.833 | 2.833 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #49 | 3.316 | 3.316 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #60 | 3.368 | 3.368 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #65 | 3.526 | 3.526 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #67 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Overall | #68 | 3.379 | 3.379 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #87 | 2.818 | 2.818 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #95 | 3.273 | 3.273 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #100 | 3.409 | 3.409 |
| Overall | #108 | 3.045 | 3.045 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #118 | 2.727 | 2.727 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #99 | 2.729 | 2.813 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #107 | 3.274 | 3.375 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #110 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #116 | 2.971 | 3.063 |
| Overall | #123 | 2.838 | 2.925 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #163 | 2.122 | 2.188 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #74 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #79 | 3.577 | 3.688 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #88 | 3.335 | 3.438 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #89 | 3.092 | 3.188 |
| Overall | #91 | 3.201 | 3.300 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #116 | 2.971 | 3.063 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #101 | 3.382 | 3.600 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #106 | 2.881 | 3.067 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #118 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #119 | 2.568 | 2.733 |
| Overall | #122 | 2.893 | 3.080 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #143 | 2.693 | 2.867 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #80 | 3.200 | 3.200 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #104 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Overall | #112 | 2.980 | 2.980 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #118 | 2.600 | 2.600 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #119 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #132 | 2.850 | 2.850 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #46 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #57 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| Overall | #89 | 3.210 | 3.210 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #96 | 2.950 | 2.950 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #111 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #119 | 2.900 | 2.900 |
