This was good.
Don’t see how it connects to the theme, but a good story with a surprising ending.
Unfortunately, I had to check, and this story runs 211 words over the maximum presented in the rules, which means it should technically be disqualified.
This is a massive shame considering how good of a time I had with it.
Always love some Saurian action, and the Mesoamerican flavor really added a lot for me.
Mostly some run-on sentences and a bit of drag in the middle column of the page.
A few rough sentences of dialogue.
Also noticed a few grammatical errors (the professor’s speech opens with quotation marks but doesn’t feature any at the end, for example).
A few sentences that could have been combined for clarity (make quick into quickly, and the sentence could turn into Professor Cornacchia lunged quickly for an old man), but I can see the thought process (surprisingly quickly is a better sentence, but word count prevents some of the more illustrative sentences).
It’s not a massive deal, a lot of it is stylistic choices, such as the asterisks. I’ve used those before a lot, and don’t find them a problem.
Even without understanding the reference, I still had a great time with this.
As somebody with a penchant of latching onto too many descriptors, I try to be forgiving of similar stories. This might have had a few distracting aspects, but those were far outweighed by the good those descriptors provided.
Overall, a great time 👍
*tips hat 🎩*
Always a pleasure to read one of your short stories.
This was great. Pushed some boundaries, but I think you handled them in a manner with purpose.
Story was quite good, though the flow and clarity sometimes stumbled a bit.
Honestly, what confuses me the most was the one review saying the ending doesn’t track with the story.
I guess it seemed obvious enough to me that she’s received similar treatment in Vinci, and her new life allows her to take what she was held back from and punish the rest for her old life.
Oh well, everyone has a different opinion, I suppose.
1000 words is far too few, in my opinion.
I originally had six or seven paragraphs more of the central story, but had to cut for time. I cut even more of the descriptors. I didn’t even get to describe the inside of the hut properly.
Perhaps I was just too ambitious.
The difficult part was balancing what descriptors to keep, as losing the right ones in the tale makes it more mysterious, and the wrong ones in reality make it bland.
I could have done better.
Still, glad you enjoyed it!
We'll have to agree to disagree there, but I see where you're coming from.
To me, an allyship would involve active participation from both sides, but again, that's all within the purviews of your conundrum of philosophy.
It's still a solid story with great action and a thus-far greatly unique premise. I just can't give it full marks regarding how laid-out I feel the theme was and is.