211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #5 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #21 | 4.048 | 4.048 |
Overall | #22 | 3.886 | 3.886 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #23 | 3.881 | 3.881 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #31 | 3.738 | 3.738 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #50 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #1 | 4.333 | 4.333 |
Overall | #11 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #14 | 4.148 | 4.148 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #23 | 3.815 | 3.815 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #23 | 4.037 | 4.037 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #25 | 3.852 | 3.852 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #6 | 4.038 | 4.038 |
Overall | #14 | 3.985 | 3.985 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #17 | 3.868 | 3.868 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #22 | 3.906 | 3.906 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #26 | 3.849 | 3.849 |
Overall | #31 | 3.777 | 3.777 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #36 | 3.623 | 3.623 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #52 | 3.302 | 3.302 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #18 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #25 | 3.808 | 3.808 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Overall | #41 | 3.638 | 3.638 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #56 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #88 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #19 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #28 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
Overall | #28 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #33 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #43 | 3.722 | 3.722 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #19 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #31 | 3.632 | 3.632 |
Overall | #35 | 3.726 | 3.726 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #45 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #71 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #17 | 3.967 | 3.967 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #26 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
Overall | #29 | 3.787 | 3.787 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #67 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #9 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
Overall | #13 | 3.996 | 3.996 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #14 | 3.885 | 3.885 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #15 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #19 | 4.058 | 4.058 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #23 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Overall | #26 | 3.823 | 3.823 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #29 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #32 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #37 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #28 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #34 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #34 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
Overall | #43 | 3.624 | 3.624 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #78 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #4 | 4.275 | 4.275 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #9 | 4.250 | 4.250 |
Overall | #10 | 4.045 | 4.045 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #21 | 3.825 | 3.825 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #35 | 3.925 | 3.925 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #64 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #78 | 3.346 | 3.346 |
Overall | #79 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #82 | 2.923 | 2.923 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #136 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #20 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #27 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
Overall | #30 | 3.785 | 3.785 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #37 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #25 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #38 | 3.919 | 3.919 |
Overall | #47 | 3.557 | 3.557 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #63 | 3.351 | 3.351 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #66 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #87 | 3.243 | 3.243 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #11 | 3.933 | 3.933 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #11 | 4.067 | 4.067 |
Overall | #25 | 3.827 | 3.827 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #32 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #39 | 3.917 | 3.917 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #45 | 3.383 | 3.383 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #9 | 3.955 | 3.955 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #11 | 3.955 | 3.955 |
Overall | #18 | 3.945 | 3.945 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #21 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #40 | 3.909 | 3.909 |