211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #18 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #25 | 3.808 | 3.808 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Overall | #41 | 3.638 | 3.638 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #56 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #88 | 2.808 | 2.808 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
| Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #28 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #34 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #34 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| Overall | #43 | 3.624 | 3.624 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #78 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #34 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Overall | #44 | 3.617 | 3.617 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #45 | 3.708 | 3.708 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #50 | 3.625 | 3.625 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #51 | 3.792 | 3.792 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #54 | 3.292 | 3.292 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
| Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #30 | 3.909 | 3.909 |
| Overall | #46 | 3.570 | 3.570 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #51 | 3.303 | 3.303 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #52 | 3.606 | 3.606 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #64 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #66 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #25 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #38 | 3.919 | 3.919 |
| Overall | #47 | 3.557 | 3.557 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #63 | 3.351 | 3.351 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #66 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #87 | 3.243 | 3.243 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #39 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #43 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #43 | 3.560 | 3.560 |
| Overall | #48 | 3.520 | 3.520 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #131 | 2.440 | 2.440 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #33 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #47 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Overall | #49 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #61 | 3.556 | 3.556 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #71 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #85 | 3.556 | 3.556 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #48 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #48 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #50 | 3.489 | 3.489 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #85 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #40 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #47 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Overall | #51 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #57 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #62 | 3.216 | 3.216 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #95 | 3.189 | 3.189 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #41 | 3.409 | 3.409 |
| Overall | #52 | 3.482 | 3.482 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #54 | 3.591 | 3.591 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #61 | 3.364 | 3.364 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #86 | 3.545 | 3.545 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #43 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #49 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Overall | #53 | 3.482 | 3.707 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #56 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #53 | 3.300 | 3.300 |
| Overall | #54 | 3.480 | 3.480 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #58 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #60 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #62 | 3.550 | 3.550 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #74 | 3.250 | 3.250 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #48 | 3.324 | 3.324 |
| Overall | #55 | 3.465 | 3.465 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #56 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #62 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #63 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #76 | 3.353 | 3.353 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #38 | 3.607 | 3.607 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #39 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #45 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #56 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #77 | 3.393 | 3.393 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #41 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #44 | 3.529 | 3.529 |
| Overall | #57 | 3.459 | 3.459 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #58 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #77 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #97 | 3.235 | 3.235 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #42 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #42 | 3.395 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #58 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #63 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #73 | 3.456 | 3.563 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #94 | 3.032 | 3.125 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #54 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #59 | 3.456 | 3.456 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #79 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #41 | 3.569 | 3.800 |
| Overall | #60 | 3.432 | 3.653 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #64 | 3.444 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #65 | 3.695 | 3.933 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #67 | 3.507 | 3.733 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #79 | 2.943 | 3.133 |
