My Municipality : 

Ok so, I'll have to admit that I was a bit lost with the story at first, obscure Finnish political situations aren't exactly my field of expertise, but it was expertly written and the humor helped a ton to capture my attention! Also, at the moment I'm writing this, My Municipality is my favourite VN when it comes to the implementation of theme, both through a very literal interpretation of the word "expansion" but presented in a creative way.

I appreciate the summary of what actually happened near the end of the VN, it was a nice anchor to reality to show the consequences of this whole story. 

When it comes to the more technical aspects, I must say you have a very nice UI, and I believe you made a good use of Godot for the different special effects in the VN. I think it's rarely mentioned, but you also made a great use of sound effects. 

All in all, I enjoyed My Municipality a lot more than I thought I would, given the subject matter, because you made it both informative and entertaining!

Spoilers etc:

Theme: I'm conflicted, in that while this is about literal expansion of the regions, it's also more-so a "humanized" tale refactoring expansion as a relationship tale, but then the relationship is able to be legally impacted, but then we do see the parts about the aftermath. It's a tale about expansion, but expansion is only present as a conceit in an extended metaphor that I thin would have carried over better if the boundaries between the characters as characters and the characters as regions was more firmly defined.

Story: There's a sort of inability to commit to the premise of the work, which is rough when dealing with a work about an extended metaphor. I felt like this conceit was present in many ways throughout the work, which had me not as connected as I could have been, because I kept seeing what were moments of self-indulgence (and while I think it'd be hard to find a conceit that isn't self indulgent when telling a story, that doesn't mean  it's helping make the conceit consistent).

In the initial propaganda advert, Helsinki  provides some characterization to the exposition, albeit in the way that a politician speaking to their constituents does (artificial, not in a way people speak to people), but then the second instance of the map screen is primarily just pure exposition, Helsinki not functioning as a character in that scene. Sipoo isn't even really emotionally present, just regurgitating facts when the second map screen arises. In that function, Sipoo just becomes like a teleprompter, and we're trying to put some emotionality to the elements at hand.

The characterization of Helsinki falls flat for me. She's never able to be fully a character nor fully a region. She says things that are inconsistent with her character (someone posh saying balancussy?). If the house is a means to recognize the affluence of a region (and yet, the characters also travel through said regions to distinct locations within, so then what does the house become then? An abandoned metaphor?), why don't we get invited over to Helsinki's house instead of those dates? She's very Cruella DeVille and other similar disney villains, but without their extensive flair, existing more of a caricature.

The dates themselves aren't quite fully implemented. The voice of the work paints Helsinki as a flat character, a one dimensional villain and sure, those exist, but politicians try to pretend otherwise in their pleas ( at least, they're supposed to not have the mask off). The economy scene was just an extended Lucille Bluth.Arrested Development sort of moment, the movie theatre scene felt more like you advertising your taste in media, the non-sequitur joke date screen undercut the mood of the piece-- for something fought in law and for a relationship, it made light of the situation. I love jokes, but they should work to the tone of the piece, not pull the tone away to rubberband back. The third date didn't even have an outcome, but had Dom propose Sipoo's plan on behalf of Sipoo? I suppose the conceit was that this was already determined as part of the private talks, but then that doesn't really carry over to what happens when people go through these things.

We have commentary on voting, in that a "region" didn't vote for the prime minister-- what does that entail, in this narrative? Is it like the State's electoral votes? Did none of the constituents within vote for that person? The throw-away joke at the "expense" of the prime minister is too close to the material of the work, exploring political events where the political is perhaps the most personal it can get (... the Hetalia mode, of which I don't think really tends to go to actual locations, but exists in more of a metaspace? At least, Denmark Vs the World does which functions in a similar conceit). In a similar vein, what does it mean for a region to have children? Splitting themselves into more sub-regions? I feel like in most political spaces, stuff tends to get absorbed by others, not splinter off if they want to endure.

At times, the prose felt utilitarian to explain the mundanity, but that mundanity was introduced for elements that didn't quite always follow through.

I wonder if some of the characterization could have been restored if the exposition for the map scenes weren't done from Helsinki's primary PoV (like some sort of political advert), but in the guise of Finland, talking about her children (because that's how Finland is broken up, no?) It would have allowed for that judgment of Helsinki, as opposed to Helsinki coming off as explicitly disingenuous. 

---

Story asides: There's a lot of local references that I naturally didn't catch, and that makes sense. I'm not local. The only part where that didn't work with me were as noted before, in that it couldn't decide to be in a more metaphoric space or a more physical space.

Is the Vanta panda joke a commentary on the region? We barely interact with Vanta throughout the work. What it is trying to say with that absurdist joke?

---

Presentation: I think you really stood out here, with your pictures of actual places that were affected by this development. I liked your gag for the nicknaming, but when given a world of open input, I hoped for like a profanity check (albeit that may be hard across multiple languages), given I named Dom Dickhead after playing around with it given the "bullying" re: using the default nickname.

I did like the presentation of the map screens, and the use of transitions, although the font you used made Sipoo look liked SIP(two number zeros). Skinny O's become 0's.

The legalese text was too large, imo. One's eyes naturally slip off that, which means that you have to travel too far to go back to the words that your brain resists (or maybe it's just cuz I'm too close to legalese in my day job that it pains me to see more off work hours).

I don't like that I can't click to advance the text, even if the default text speed is pretty fast.

I thought it was funny you had US calendar dating format.

The first two 

Creativity: Doing a Hetalia-esque rendition of one's local politics is bold, and there were some good uses of animation in your engine to reflect the mood.

I enjoyed your "where are they now" documentary sequence.

Overall thoughts: The idea is fun and interesting, but I think the execution was too muddied for me to be in love. It had too many elements, many conflicting, and a lot of nods to what felt like filmography moments without them necessarily translating into the same contexts.

I wanted to care more for the characters, but they felt flat, because half the time they were explicitly the regions as mouthpieces for politicians, as opposed to characters with agendas, and even then some of the motivation (even if true to real life) was so passive. Metaphor can translate real events into something more, like seeing a flashback to a clandestine meeting between Helsinki and Sipoo instead of just getting another history lesson dump.

By being both a documentary and a sorta rom-com, it wasn't quite perfectly either in ways that pulled against both genres.

I still appreciate the novel attempt, and the curious lesson on Finland politics. An interesting gaze into Purkka's creative PoV.

I loved it! While the subject matter is definitely not for everyone (I read this both on my own and with a some people who found it extremely boring), as someone who studied law, works in public administration, and loves political geography, I was personally ready and primed to like this game.

The implementation of the theme, the journalistic quality of the work, the way it tries to teach real life lore to horny furries via gay wolf shenanigans, were all just a joy. And everything in the presentation looks crisp and purposeful.

Minor Spoilers to follow

The story was fun but surprisingly engaging: the scene where the game shows you real life pictures of Östersundom today was a genuine gut punch that almost made me teary. My main gripe with the game is everything that follows that moment: the way the game goes straight into explaining what happened in Östersundom right after showing the pictures lessens the impact somewhat (don't explain to me what you've already shown, the pictures are worth more than a thousand words!).

And the final scene between Dom and Sipoo, while very nicely written, is part of something that left me a bit confused about the game. There are some hints here and there that Dom might not be completely happy with Sipoo and might have some doubts about their relationship after all, and this seems to be reinforced in the final scene when, given the opportunity to do otherwise, the two don't really reconnect and keep going their separate ways. However, this underlying thread doesn't really seem to be explored and I'm not sure what the story is doing with this, and how it relates to the overall metaphor.

Some minor nitpicks and assorted feedback:

• The quotes at the beginning of the game disappear way to quickly for me to properly absorb them. Those were not easy sentences to read in what felt like under 5 seconds.
• For something that is trying to report on a real life story, the dates were a bit confusing throughout. The first date appearing in the game contains no hint about whether it's supposed to be read in European or American format, and later on the format sometimes switches from one mode to the other.
• I believe the skip function could use some improvement: while for a story this size it works well enough, I would need for it to be *way* faster for it to be really useful in any larger project. I also noticed it stopped skipping on its own when it came to the aforementioned pictures.
• The game throws a lot of Finnish words at you and it is really difficult to keep track of who's who and what's what, although this problem was mostly gone by the second reading. Still I do think throwing some occasional reminder for reader's benefit, at least in English version, would go a long way. Small things like saying the occasional "Prime Minister Vanhanen" instead of just Vanhanen would help.