211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #9 | 4.109 | 4.109 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #16 | 4.125 | 4.125 |
| Overall | #20 | 3.922 | 3.922 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #21 | 3.797 | 3.797 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #24 | 3.813 | 3.813 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #38 | 3.766 | 3.766 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Overall | #1 | 4.320 | 4.320 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #1 | 4.514 | 4.514 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #1 | 4.429 | 4.429 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #2 | 4.486 | 4.486 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #3 | 4.400 | 4.400 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #22 | 3.771 | 3.771 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #23 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Overall | #26 | 3.823 | 3.823 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #29 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #32 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #37 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #15 | 4.133 | 4.400 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #15 | 3.883 | 4.133 |
| Overall | #21 | 3.920 | 4.173 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #21 | 4.008 | 4.267 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #24 | 3.757 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #29 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #25 | 3.757 | 3.757 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #38 | 3.919 | 3.919 |
| Overall | #47 | 3.557 | 3.557 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #63 | 3.351 | 3.351 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #66 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #87 | 3.243 | 3.243 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #5 | 4.171 | 4.171 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #6 | 4.343 | 4.343 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #6 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Overall | #8 | 4.126 | 4.126 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #9 | 4.200 | 4.200 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #26 | 3.714 | 3.714 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #27 | 3.703 | 3.703 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #35 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Overall | #37 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #47 | 3.838 | 3.838 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #47 | 3.649 | 3.649 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #49 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #6 | 4.316 | 4.316 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #11 | 4.211 | 4.211 |
| Overall | #12 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #16 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #27 | 3.789 | 3.789 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #28 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #54 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #59 | 3.456 | 3.456 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #79 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #83 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #29 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #33 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #39 | 3.583 | 3.583 |
| Overall | #45 | 3.600 | 3.600 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #69 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #81 | 3.306 | 3.306 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #19 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #31 | 3.632 | 3.632 |
| Overall | #35 | 3.726 | 3.726 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #45 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #71 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #32 | 3.629 | 3.629 |
| Overall | #39 | 3.669 | 3.669 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #41 | 3.743 | 3.743 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #46 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #69 | 3.657 | 3.657 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #19 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #28 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
| Overall | #28 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #33 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #43 | 3.722 | 3.722 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #34 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #46 | 3.699 | 3.813 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #62 | 3.517 | 3.625 |
| Overall | #71 | 3.359 | 3.462 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #108 | 2.850 | 2.938 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #115 | 3.214 | 3.313 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #35 | 3.516 | 3.516 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #40 | 3.581 | 3.581 |
| Overall | #42 | 3.626 | 3.626 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #52 | 3.645 | 3.645 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #73 | 3.387 | 3.387 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #48 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #48 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Overall | #50 | 3.489 | 3.489 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #85 | 3.278 | 3.278 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #89 | 3.333 | 3.333 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #20 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #27 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
| Overall | #30 | 3.785 | 3.785 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #37 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
| Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #38 | 3.607 | 3.607 |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #39 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #45 | 3.857 | 3.857 |
| Overall | #56 | 3.464 | 3.464 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #77 | 3.393 | 3.393 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #112 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
| Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
| Was there a sense of progression? | #40 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
| Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
| Overall | #65 | 3.400 | 3.400 |
| How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #87 | 3.350 | 3.350 |
| Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #110 | 3.050 | 3.050 |
