211 entries were submitted between 2025-01-01 00:00:00 and 2025-01-14 00:00:00. 4,032 ratings were given to 210 entries (99.5%) between 2025-01-14 00:00:00 and 2025-01-21 00:00:00. The average number of ratings per game was 19.1 and the median was 17.
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #15 | 4.133 | 4.400 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #15 | 3.883 | 4.133 |
Overall | #21 | 3.920 | 4.173 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #21 | 4.008 | 4.267 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #24 | 3.757 | 4.000 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #29 | 3.820 | 4.067 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #5 | 4.095 | 4.095 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #21 | 4.048 | 4.048 |
Overall | #22 | 3.886 | 3.886 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #23 | 3.881 | 3.881 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #31 | 3.738 | 3.738 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #50 | 3.667 | 3.667 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #16 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #17 | 4.120 | 4.120 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #18 | 3.880 | 3.880 |
Overall | #23 | 3.864 | 3.864 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #39 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #44 | 3.720 | 3.720 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #12 | 3.950 | 3.950 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #12 | 4.050 | 4.050 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #15 | 4.100 | 4.100 |
Overall | #24 | 3.850 | 3.850 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #53 | 3.450 | 3.450 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #61 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #11 | 3.933 | 3.933 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #11 | 4.067 | 4.067 |
Overall | #25 | 3.827 | 3.827 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #32 | 3.833 | 3.833 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #39 | 3.917 | 3.917 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #45 | 3.383 | 3.383 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #23 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Overall | #26 | 3.823 | 3.823 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #27 | 3.846 | 3.846 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #29 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #32 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #37 | 3.769 | 3.769 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #14 | 4.133 | 4.133 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #18 | 3.867 | 3.867 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #24 | 3.867 | 3.867 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #26 | 3.967 | 3.967 |
Overall | #27 | 3.813 | 3.813 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #61 | 3.233 | 3.233 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #19 | 3.944 | 3.944 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #28 | 3.778 | 3.778 |
Overall | #28 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #33 | 3.611 | 3.611 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #43 | 3.722 | 3.722 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #17 | 3.967 | 3.967 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #22 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #26 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
Overall | #29 | 3.787 | 3.787 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #67 | 3.167 | 3.167 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #20 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #27 | 3.962 | 3.962 |
Overall | #30 | 3.785 | 3.785 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #36 | 3.500 | 3.500 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #36 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #37 | 3.615 | 3.615 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #17 | 4.094 | 4.094 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #24 | 4.019 | 4.019 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #26 | 3.849 | 3.849 |
Overall | #31 | 3.777 | 3.777 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #36 | 3.623 | 3.623 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #52 | 3.302 | 3.302 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #17 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #19 | 4.059 | 4.059 |
Overall | #32 | 3.765 | 3.765 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #33 | 3.824 | 3.824 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #52 | 3.471 | 3.471 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #55 | 3.588 | 3.588 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #2 | 4.406 | 4.406 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #30 | 3.750 | 3.750 |
Overall | #33 | 3.763 | 3.763 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #44 | 3.688 | 3.688 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #46 | 3.844 | 3.844 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #69 | 3.125 | 3.125 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #11 | 4.154 | 4.154 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #12 | 3.923 | 3.923 |
Overall | #34 | 3.754 | 3.754 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #37 | 3.731 | 3.731 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #48 | 3.692 | 3.692 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #55 | 3.269 | 3.269 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #19 | 3.842 | 3.842 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #26 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #31 | 3.632 | 3.632 |
Overall | #35 | 3.726 | 3.726 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #45 | 3.684 | 3.684 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #71 | 3.474 | 3.474 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #13 | 4.045 | 4.045 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #35 | 3.636 | 3.636 |
Overall | #36 | 3.700 | 3.700 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #36 | 3.773 | 3.773 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #44 | 3.864 | 3.864 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #65 | 3.182 | 3.182 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Was there a sense of progression? | #27 | 3.703 | 3.703 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #35 | 3.811 | 3.811 |
Overall | #37 | 3.697 | 3.697 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #47 | 3.838 | 3.838 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #47 | 3.649 | 3.649 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #49 | 3.486 | 3.486 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #28 | 3.941 | 3.941 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #33 | 3.706 | 3.706 |
Overall | #38 | 3.671 | 3.671 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #41 | 3.882 | 3.882 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #48 | 3.647 | 3.647 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #66 | 3.176 | 3.176 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #31 | 3.800 | 3.800 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #32 | 3.629 | 3.629 |
Overall | #39 | 3.669 | 3.669 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #41 | 3.743 | 3.743 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #46 | 3.514 | 3.514 |
Did the game align well with the task? | #69 | 3.657 | 3.657 |
Criteria | Rank | Score* | Raw Score |
Did the game align well with the task? | #22 | 4.043 | 4.043 |
Was there a sense of progression? | #38 | 3.478 | 3.478 |
Overall | #40 | 3.661 | 3.661 |
Did the secondary mechanic complement the core mechanic well? | #42 | 3.565 | 3.565 |
How well implemented was the core mechanic? | #51 | 3.652 | 3.652 |
Would you like to see this game idea developed further? | #58 | 3.565 | 3.565 |